Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

Top Posters Since October 2003
dp1	4000+
orolan	4000+
Navigatr1	2500+
Silvert...	2500+
1dadof5	2500+
Valerie	2000+
steve	1500+
victori...	1000+
myoung	1000+
rabbitr...	750+
HPierce	750+
poetsdr...	750+
Renunci...	750+
lj	750+
fallenone	500+
DoTheCr...	500+
marta	500+
momhelp...	500+
prozac	500+
rebel51	500+
PVulcan	250+
anti	250+
rodsmith	250+
LockEmUp	250+
Quest	250+
artie	250+
KK	250+
LostTime	250+
TGoodman	250+
amberleaf	250+
deadmom...	250+
brennus	100+
scarlett	100+
mousein...	100+
thepar	100+
assumpt...	100+
lildrafire	100+
JakeLF	100+
MrTruth	100+
june5	100+

Newest Users
Registered within the last 72 hours.
glmoyao66
greatdane
hiimgreg
jpcustom
mame4454
movado1

Forum: Site Goals and Ideas

Thread (Discussion): A clarification of a rule please

Switch to Flat View

In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 166876 (In Reply to Message 166843)

Posted by dp1 on Nov 08, 2005 04:09 AM | Also by dp1

Gender: Female, Age Bracket: N/A, State: Florida, Country: United States

I noticed you've been rejecting postes in the other side from non-RSOs. Is there some reason you haven't rejected Jakes? He is not a confirmed RSO and no one has been able to tell the truth about his alleged pedphilia. I don't understand why the RSOs should be subjected to non-RSO posts unless of course they welcome Jake as a visitor or have confirmed his pedophilia which I sincerely doubt is the case. I find it offensive that he is catagorized a pedo/RSO when in fact that isn't the case. The people in the other side have enough issues with labels and the last thing we need to do is add more. Just my 2 cents. Reject the posts and ban him from both forums as he fits no category. The general forum is VERY appropriate for this non-RSO/non-Victim.

See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult the Glossary.

Switch to Flat View

Message 166843

Posted by steve on Nov 08, 2005 12:49 AM | Also by steve

Gender: Male, Age Bracket: N/A, State: Virginia, Country: United States

I made some new policies, which I am enforcing.  I am being more strict with some than I have in the past and possibly more strict than I'd like to be long term.  I was hoping that everyone would respect the rules and adhere to them and that after there was some semblance of order and most of the posts were constructive, I could loosen them somewhat.  Frankly, many users have disappointed me and I'm extremely surprised that a handful have whined like babies and either stormed off or threatened to.  For any that think I am talking about them, don't flatter yourself by thinking that you're the only one that behaved that way or that your behavior was the most extreme I dealt with.  Also keep in mind that you aren't privy to the private messages and emails I received or the several dozen posts that were rejected before ever seeing the light of day in the forums.

Now, finally, to my point.  dp1 was politely told that she was not to post to The Other Side, at least for the time being, reasons were shared, and she was encouraged to hold her horses.  That's all I have to say about that because what she and I discussed is between her and I.

I have an idea I'd like to propose that will hopefully be well received and considered a fair solution.  I'll share it in a new thread in this forum later this evening.

Thread

166369, rabbitreborn, Nov 03, 2005 10:13 PM
      166398, orolan, Nov 04, 2005 02:25 AM
            166439, rabbitreborn, Nov 04, 2005 02:37 PM
                  166466, dp1, Nov 04, 2005 04:30 PM
                        166839, steve, Nov 08, 2005 12:29 AM
      166406, steve, Nov 04, 2005 03:01 AM
            166437, rabbitreborn, Nov 04, 2005 02:29 PM
                  166840, steve, Nov 08, 2005 12:35 AM
                        166910, rabbitreborn, Nov 08, 2005 03:00 PM
            166440, rabbitreborn, Nov 04, 2005 02:43 PM
                  166441, Valerie, Nov 04, 2005 02:51 PM
                        166460, dp1, Nov 04, 2005 03:57 PM
                              166465, Valerie, Nov 04, 2005 04:29 PM
                                    166468, anti, Nov 04, 2005 04:43 PM [lol]
                                    166498, rabbitreborn, Nov 04, 2005 10:03 PM
                                          166629, orolan, Nov 05, 2005 10:55 PM
                                                166819, rabbitreborn, Nov 07, 2005 08:03 PM
                                          166843, steve, Nov 08, 2005 12:49 AM
                                                166876, dp1, Nov 08, 2005 04:09 AM
                                                166914, dp1, Nov 08, 2005 03:49 PM [Steve]
                              166476, Renunciation, Nov 04, 2005 05:11 PM [Off Duty PO posting?]
                                    166507, dp1, Nov 05, 2005 02:24 AM
                        166627, orolan, Nov 05, 2005 10:51 PM
                  166841, steve, Nov 08, 2005 12:40 AM

Forum Home | Top of Thread

Tell a Friend about this page.

Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

Forum: Site Goals and IdeasThread (Discussion): A clarification of a rule please

Message 166876 (In Reply to Message 166843)

Message 166843

Thread

Forum: Site Goals and Ideas

Thread (Discussion): A clarification of a rule please