Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

Top Posters Since October 2003
dp1	4000+
orolan	4000+
Navigatr1	2500+
Silvert...	2500+
1dadof5	2500+
Valerie	2000+
steve	1500+
victori...	1000+
myoung	1000+
rabbitr...	750+
HPierce	750+
poetsdr...	750+
Renunci...	750+
lj	750+
fallenone	500+
DoTheCr...	500+
marta	500+
momhelp...	500+
prozac	500+
rebel51	500+
PVulcan	250+
anti	250+
rodsmith	250+
LockEmUp	250+
Quest	250+
artie	250+
KK	250+
LostTime	250+
TGoodman	250+
amberleaf	250+
deadmom...	250+
brennus	100+
scarlett	100+
mousein...	100+
thepar	100+
assumpt...	100+
lildrafire	100+
JakeLF	100+
MrTruth	100+
june5	100+

Newest Users
Registered within the last 72 hours.
BrendaEnglish
glmoyao66
greatdane
hiimgreg
jpcustom
mame4454
movado1
pelican

Forum: Site Goals and Ideas

Thread (Discussion): A clarification of a rule please

Switch to Flat View

In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 166439 (In Reply to Message 166398)

Posted by rabbitreborn on Nov 04, 2005 02:37 PM | Also by rabbitreborn

Gender: Male, Age Bracket: 30 - 39, State: Florida, Country: United States

I for one hadn't picked up on that paradox. I didn't realize that offenders were barred EVEN if the victim asked for offender participation.

Knowing your attention to detail I take that as a compliment. :-)

But I would have to ask you why a topic that you would expect everyone to respond to would be in The Other Side and not the General Forum?

I could visualize a issue being discussed that possibly the offender or a respondant to an offender might wish to solicit the advise of someone in LE such as dp1, DTCDTT, or Eagle. The issue might be very specifically related to Sex Offender issues and could POSSIBLY not be something that the offender doesn't want to be having "bashing" responses to, so he/she posts into the Forum designated as being for SO's only, but later decides that the advise of one of our LE members might be highly useful.

See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult the Glossary.

Switch to Flat View

Message 166398

Posted by orolan on Nov 04, 2005 02:25 AM | Also by orolan

Gender: Male, Age Bracket: 40 - 49, State: N/A, Country: United States

I for one hadn't picked up on that paradox. I didn't realize that offenders were barred EVEN if the victim asked for offender participation.
As an offender let me say what I think about your Other Side questions.
<blockquote><span class="mb-quote">If I , as the originator of a thread in "the other side" wish to be receiving responses from every one on this forum, I mearly state that either as the opening line of my post or as the subtitle of the post correct?</span></blockquote>
That's how I read it. But I would have to ask you why a topic that you would expect everyone to respond to would be in The Other Side and not the General Forum?
<blockquote><span class="mb-quote">How does this rule apply if I am not the thread creator but would still like to have responses from all site visitors?</span></blockquote>
Actually in this case you are the one responding to the offender's question. So it isn't right for you to solicit further responses to his question from people he didn't ask.
Often threads run off on tangents. The original subject gets lost and the little side-threads tend to turn in to personal attacks. That's been the biggest problem in all forums.

Thread

166369, rabbitreborn, Nov 03, 2005 10:13 PM
      166398, orolan, Nov 04, 2005 02:25 AM
            166439, rabbitreborn, Nov 04, 2005 02:37 PM
                  166466, dp1, Nov 04, 2005 04:30 PM
                        166839, steve, Nov 08, 2005 12:29 AM
      166406, steve, Nov 04, 2005 03:01 AM
            166437, rabbitreborn, Nov 04, 2005 02:29 PM
                  166840, steve, Nov 08, 2005 12:35 AM
                        166910, rabbitreborn, Nov 08, 2005 03:00 PM
            166440, rabbitreborn, Nov 04, 2005 02:43 PM
                  166441, Valerie, Nov 04, 2005 02:51 PM
                        166460, dp1, Nov 04, 2005 03:57 PM
                              166465, Valerie, Nov 04, 2005 04:29 PM
                                    166468, anti, Nov 04, 2005 04:43 PM [lol]
                                    166498, rabbitreborn, Nov 04, 2005 10:03 PM
                                          166629, orolan, Nov 05, 2005 10:55 PM
                                                166819, rabbitreborn, Nov 07, 2005 08:03 PM
                                          166843, steve, Nov 08, 2005 12:49 AM
                                                166876, dp1, Nov 08, 2005 04:09 AM
                                                166914, dp1, Nov 08, 2005 03:49 PM [Steve]
                              166476, Renunciation, Nov 04, 2005 05:11 PM [Off Duty PO posting?]
                                    166507, dp1, Nov 05, 2005 02:24 AM
                        166627, orolan, Nov 05, 2005 10:51 PM
                  166841, steve, Nov 08, 2005 12:40 AM

Forum Home | Top of Thread

Tell a Friend about this page.

Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

Forum: Site Goals and IdeasThread (Discussion): A clarification of a rule please

Message 166439 (In Reply to Message 166398)

Message 166398

Thread

Forum: Site Goals and Ideas

Thread (Discussion): A clarification of a rule please