Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

Top Posters Since October 2003
dp1	4000+
orolan	4000+
Navigatr1	2500+
Silvert...	2500+
1dadof5	2500+
Valerie	2000+
steve	1500+
victori...	1000+
myoung	1000+
rabbitr...	750+
HPierce	750+
poetsdr...	750+
Renunci...	750+
lj	750+
fallenone	500+
DoTheCr...	500+
marta	500+
momhelp...	500+
prozac	500+
rebel51	500+
PVulcan	250+
anti	250+
rodsmith	250+
LockEmUp	250+
Quest	250+
artie	250+
KK	250+
LostTime	250+
TGoodman	250+
amberleaf	250+
deadmom...	250+
brennus	100+
scarlett	100+
mousein...	100+
thepar	100+
assumpt...	100+
lildrafire	100+
JakeLF	100+
MrTruth	100+
june5	100+

Newest Users
Registered within the last 72 hours.
chooch
genospice
hud123
kelstress
unknowable

Forum: Site Goals and Ideas

Thread (Discussion): make victims co-moderators for most forums

Switch to Flat View

In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 139081 (In Reply to Message 139068)
Steve

Posted by Rachel on Aug 24, 2004 03:12 AM | Also by Rachel

Gender: Female, Age Bracket: 40 - 49, State: N/A, Country: Australia

All that makes sense and sounds good....I have 1 concern which I'm having trouble putting into words, so I'll use a pretend scenario:
Person A is very vocal about victims rights and frequently irritates person B who may be supportive of paedophiles. Person B is also a moderator, and through either his dislike of person A or his disagreeance (is that a word ? lol) with the post, votes not to allow the post...
What do you think ?

See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult the Glossary.

Switch to Flat View

Message 139068

Posted by steve on Aug 24, 2004 02:33 AM | Also by steve

Gender: Male, Age Bracket: 30 - 39, State: Virginia, Country: United States

<blockquote><span class="mb-quote">I'm not sure how the process works as far as choosing moderators, isn't it for those people who post regularly ?</span></blockquote>

That's not a requirement in my mind, but I'd require a level of trust.  A user who has posted here a lot over a long period of time and is willing to moderate according to standards that I find acceptable is someone I'd consider.  I have two people who help out from time to time with moderation who do not post to the forums.

A year ago I was planning a fairly elaborate user-based moderation system where many users would be able to control moderation, but I have not implemented it due to a lack of time to program the functionality and observations of its effectiveness in other forums I visit with similar mechanisms.

I am considering a way that users would be able to moderate as a group, but it's just an idea I've been kicking around for a few months.  In a nutshell, users who have met a certain threshold for time here and total posts would be able to view a queue of pending messages and either 1. do nothing, 2. assign a message a vote of confidence (worthy to post) or 3. recommend it for admin review.  If a certain total # or % give a message a vote of confidence it would be approved.  If a certain # recommend it for admin review it would be removed from the queue and flagged for admin review.  All other posts would stay in the queue until either of those scenarious occurs or an admin approves or rejects the post.  Admins would have authority to overturn any decision, but if the system worked well, that wouldn't be necessary often.

The big issue is how to prevent abuse.  I don't have a firm idea about the mechanics, but I would basically look at how often a user's vote differed from user votes that resulted in #2 or #3 or were different than how I'd vote.  I probably didn't communicate that well, but basically if a user makes blatantly poor moderation decisions, the user would be warned and could ultimately lose moderation privileges, at least temporarily.  Thoughts?

Thread

139026, brennus, Aug 23, 2004 02:08 AM
      139036, steve, Aug 23, 2004 04:11 AM
            139039, brennus, Aug 23, 2004 04:56 AM
                  139069, steve, Aug 24, 2004 02:39 AM
                        139093, brennus, Aug 24, 2004 02:09 PM
      139049, Rachel, Aug 23, 2004 10:15 AM
            139068, steve, Aug 24, 2004 02:33 AM
                  139081, Rachel, Aug 24, 2004 03:12 AM [Steve]
                        139085, steve, Aug 24, 2004 04:13 AM
                              139090, Rachel, Aug 24, 2004 10:57 AM
                  139095, Navigatr1, Aug 24, 2004 03:53 PM [steve]
                        139125, 1dadof5, Aug 25, 2004 08:47 PM
                              139150, dp1, Aug 26, 2004 01:08 PM [Hater Support Group?]
                              139158, orolan, Aug 26, 2004 02:46 PM
                              139172, Rachel, Aug 26, 2004 11:07 PM [Yeah right]
                                    139203, 1dadof5, Aug 27, 2004 09:22 PM [rachel]
                                          139207, dp1, Aug 28, 2004 02:08 AM
                                                140339, Silverthorne, Oct 09, 2004 05:42 PM [DP1]
                                    139204, orolan, Aug 27, 2004 11:32 PM
                                          139208, dp1, Aug 28, 2004 02:18 AM
                                                139218, dp1, Aug 28, 2004 12:27 PM
      139179, poetsdreamscape, Aug 27, 2004 02:59 AM [no posting]
      139205, orolan, Aug 27, 2004 11:37 PM
            140340, Silverthorne, Oct 09, 2004 05:43 PM
                  140341, dp1, Oct 09, 2004 11:13 PM

Forum Home | Top of Thread

Tell a Friend about this page.

Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

Forum: Site Goals and IdeasThread (Discussion): make victims co-moderators for most forums

Message 139081 (In Reply to Message 139068)Steve

Message 139068

Thread

Forum: Site Goals and Ideas

Thread (Discussion): make victims co-moderators for most forums

Message 139081 (In Reply to Message 139068)
Steve