Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

Top Posters Since October 2003
dp1	4000+
orolan	4000+
Navigatr1	2500+
Silvert...	2500+
1dadof5	2500+
Valerie	2000+
steve	1500+
victori...	1000+
myoung	1000+
rabbitr...	750+
HPierce	750+
poetsdr...	750+
Renunci...	750+
lj	750+
fallenone	500+
DoTheCr...	500+
marta	500+
momhelp...	500+
prozac	500+
rebel51	500+
PVulcan	250+
anti	250+
rodsmith	250+
LockEmUp	250+
Quest	250+
artie	250+
KK	250+
LostTime	250+
TGoodman	250+
amberleaf	250+
deadmom...	250+
brennus	100+
scarlett	100+
mousein...	100+
thepar	100+
assumpt...	100+
lildrafire	100+
JakeLF	100+
MrTruth	100+
june5	100+

Newest Users
Registered within the last 72 hours.
anitatcandia
glassmarble
hud123
khf333
lisala33
marcorl
rdehne
vanessa
zxcvbnm

Forum: The Other Side

Thread (Discussion): Pedogyny?

Switch to Flat View

In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 138318 (In Reply to Message 138125)

Posted by orolan on Aug 01, 2004 10:45 PM | Also by orolan

Gender: Male, Age Bracket: 40 - 49, State: N/A, Country: United States

Orolan, what are you rambling about?

Sorry. The way your post came across was that the whole story wasn't given to the judge at the VOP hearing and if it had, the results would have been different.
Since the judge let the man go, you would seem to support the opposite, being revocation.

I see now that your are speaking of the incompetence of the PO in his handling of the matter. Yes, had he taken the whole story to the judge BEFORE arresting the probationer, the arrest would never have happened.
But then the probationer wouldn't have lost his job and everything he owned, and the PO wouldn't have another "notch in his belt".

See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult the Glossary.

Switch to Flat View

Message 138125
Orolan

Posted by dp1 on Jul 29, 2004 06:18 AM | Also by dp1

Gender: Female, Age Bracket: N/A, State: Florida, Country: United States

<blockquote><span class="mb-quote">This comment bothers me. Can you just flat out not believe it is possible for a sex offender to have incidental contact with a child? Must EVERY contact be the result of careful planning and intent on the part of the SO to gain an opportunity to molest somebody? Sure, he could have just moved along and let the child die.</span></blockquote>

Orolan, what are you rambling about? If the incident was investigated thoroughly before action was taken he probably would have never went to jail thus no violation hearing. That's what I am saying. It doesn't matter what the PO thinks. If the PO reported the facts as they ocurred the Judge would have known the outcome BEFORE anything happened courtwise. And maybe if it was clear in the investigation after the PO submitted the report to the supervisor it may never have left the probation office. If they locked him up on a PC arrest with no warrant and the Judge read an accurate report he would have known it would get dropped anyway and maybe could have ROR'd the guy.

I never said I thought the guy should go to prison. If the incident happened as you stated it, I wouldn't have wasted one second on thinking about doing a violation. I'd just shrug it off as incidental contact and not waste any more brain cells making it into something more than what it was.

Thread

137971, fallenone, Jul 26, 2004 06:59 PM [Is there such a thing?]
      137977, assumption18, Jul 26, 2004 08:11 PM [I can't say]
            137990, dp1, Jul 26, 2004 11:00 PM [You're on A Role]
            138005, Silverthorne, Jul 27, 2004 02:00 AM [Assumption]
      138001, brennus, Jul 27, 2004 01:24 AM
      138003, Silverthorne, Jul 27, 2004 01:56 AM [Agree]
      138004, Silverthorne, Jul 27, 2004 01:57 AM [Question for Fallen]
      138027, orolan, Jul 27, 2004 04:33 PM [Sort of...]
            138044, Silverthorne, Jul 27, 2004 05:53 PM [Are you serious?????]
                  138051, orolan, Jul 27, 2004 07:22 PM [Silverthorne]
                        138069, Silverthorne, Jul 28, 2004 03:50 AM [Question for DP1]
                              138089, dp1, Jul 28, 2004 07:53 PM [Silver]
                                    138112, orolan, Jul 29, 2004 12:28 AM
                                          138125, dp1, Jul 29, 2004 06:18 AM [Orolan]
                                                138318, orolan, Aug 01, 2004 10:45 PM
      138082, fallenone, Jul 28, 2004 04:58 PM [A general reply to all]
      138106, JakeLF, Jul 28, 2004 11:48 PM [Love turning into going to far]
      138198, KK, Jul 30, 2004 05:19 AM [Fallen]
            138277, fallenone, Jul 31, 2004 06:02 PM [kk]

Forum Home | Top of Thread

Tell a Friend about this page.

Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

Forum: The Other SideThread (Discussion): Pedogyny?

Message 138318 (In Reply to Message 138125)

Message 138125Orolan

Thread

Forum: The Other Side

Thread (Discussion): Pedogyny?

Message 138125
Orolan