| Net Nanny 5 |
The world's leading parental control software, controls access to websites and other online content such as Internet-based games, blocks file sharing of music, images and videos, and monitors a user's Internet activity.
Know what your child is up to!
Click here for more information.
|
|
|
Forum: Victims and Survivors Corner
Thread (Discussion): cnn, nancy grace... Switch to Flat View
Message 170293 (In Reply to Message 170276) here we go again
Posted by Quest
on Dec 30, 2005 11:06 PM | Also by Quest
| Gender: Male,
Age Bracket: 50 - 59,
State: Minnesota,
Country: United States |
So you're saying a child victim, say 7 y.o, is capable of making these types of decisions?
Why didn't you use a 12 or 13 or 17 year old as an example?
This whole subject is stricken with those gradients of age and the two sides sit here and bounce between extremes to make the other poster sound like a freak. Enough!
If a seven year old is too young to make those decisions for herself then that is all the more reason that they need to have their own legal representation and advocates. I'm suggesting a significant departure from the norm in our legal system. Appointed and mandated council for victims. Isn't it time we quit pretending that we care about victims and actually hand them the reins?
So what if the seven year old doesn't want prosecution. So be it. Along with the law to require council we can add a statute of limitations hold. If the crime is noted then the victim has the right to pursue civil or criminal action until they are 21 or until say 10 years after the crime whichever is later.
If a 7 year old is vulnerable and easily taken advantage of then how can you claim that the 7 year old will not be influenced to prosecute by the lawyer and advocate? Seems to me that the younger they are the easier this would be.
The point is that the victims need to feel secure that they have some control. They have been overpowered now they need to be empowered.
Why is legal council for children such a forbidden item for people on this side of the fence. I just don't get this.
| See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult
the Glossary. |
Switch to Flat View
Message 170276
Posted by PVulcan
on Dec 30, 2005 06:29 PM | Also by PVulcan
| Gender: N/A,
Age Bracket: N/A,
State: N/A,
Country: United States |
Thread 170085, anti, Dec 28, 2005 03:38 AM [did anyone see it tonight?] 170116, Valerie, Dec 28, 2005 04:49 PM 170128, anti, Dec 28, 2005 06:46 PM [val] 170171, Valerie, Dec 29, 2005 12:39 PM 170217, Quest, Dec 29, 2005 05:57 PM 170227, PVulcan, Dec 29, 2005 08:13 PM 170247, Quest, Dec 30, 2005 03:27 AM 170276, PVulcan, Dec 30, 2005 06:29 PM 170293, Quest, Dec 30, 2005 11:06 PM [here we go again] 170303, steve, Dec 31, 2005 12:11 AM 170304, PVulcan, Dec 31, 2005 12:35 AM 170343, Quest, Dec 31, 2005 04:11 PM 170366, PVulcan, Dec 31, 2005 08:43 PM 170372, Quest, Jan 01, 2006 01:32 AM 170402, PVulcan, Jan 01, 2006 07:59 PM [quest] 170412, Quest, Jan 01, 2006 10:16 PM 170425, PVulcan, Jan 02, 2006 07:04 AM 170723, momhelpingbyherself, Jan 06, 2006 03:47 PM [...] 170403, PVulcan, Jan 01, 2006 08:40 PM 170413, Quest, Jan 01, 2006 10:20 PM 170426, PVulcan, Jan 02, 2006 07:06 AM 170459, Quest, Jan 02, 2006 07:14 PM 170464, PVulcan, Jan 02, 2006 09:02 PM 170414, Quest, Jan 01, 2006 10:31 PM 170722, momhelpingbyherself, Jan 06, 2006 03:40 PM 170721, momhelpingbyherself, Jan 06, 2006 03:35 PM [PVulcan] 170720, momhelpingbyherself, Jan 06, 2006 03:34 PM 170719, momhelpingbyherself, Jan 06, 2006 03:27 PM [quest and all]
Forum Home
| Top of Thread
|
|