| Net Nanny 5 |
The world's leading parental control software, controls access to websites and other online content such as Internet-based games, blocks file sharing of music, images and videos, and monitors a user's Internet activity.
Know what your child is up to!
Click here for more information.
|
|
|
Forum: Victims and Survivors Corner
Thread (Discussion): Banning and Silencing the Offenders Switch to Flat View
Message 165102 (In Reply to Message 165078)
Posted by steve
on Oct 20, 2005 02:39 PM | Also by steve
| Gender: Male,
Age Bracket: 30 - 39,
State: Virginia,
Country: United States |
Ruined, thanks for sharing your views. I read your whole post and I've read your past posts, but for brevity I'm going to quote snippets of your current post.
I consider my family to be victims of Sexual Crime. I am a Registered Sex Offender. But, I am innocent.
Some sex offenders are also victims. Some convicted of sex crimes aren't guilty of the heinous crimes most despise, some made a small one-time error in judgment and some aren't guilty. Some of us where more than hat and some of us don't fit under neat stereotypes. As I see it below are the main issues that people are concerned about.
1. Some victims might find it offensive and/or triggering to have certain types of people respond to them when discussing victim issues, namely pedophiles, sex offenders and their supporters.
2. It hasn't been clear that people such as those described above are not all prohibited from posting in this forum.
3. When someone visits this forum and reads a post by a pedophile, sex offender, etc. there is no indication that person is such before reading the post and by and large it's not clear by reading the full text of the post and is often not even clear by reading several past posts of the user or the user's optional bio in their profile.
4. Some pedophiles, sex offenders, etc. were victims and/or have insights that they feel could be relevant to a discussion in this forum.
Let's not forget in the physical world, most victims would probably not be comfortable participating in a victims group that had sex offenders and pedophiles in it and would probably chose not to participate in such a group. This forum should acknowledge and address that. Sure, some might welcome such people, at least some of the time, but the greater good has to be weighed, and based on my observations, users of this forum should be given fair notice that such people may participate and should be given the opportunity to say that they don't want such people to participate in a discussion they start. I've attempted to address #1 and #2 above by adding a note that's displayed when starting a thread or replying in this forum. I am still planning on adding a note to the main forum page and on all individual post pages as well.
#3 still needs to be addressed. I am considering either requiring pedophiles, sex offenders, etc. to disclose that they are such in their bio. in their profile or at the top of any post in this forum (that would get tedious).
#4 is a tough one. If a pedophile, offender, etc. wants to post here to have their own victim issues addressed or wants to respond because they have relevant insights I think that can be productive and appropriate, but it's also appropriate that their status be disclosed and that if a thread starter doesn't want to hear from such people, even though they are a victim, that is respected. And don't lose sight of the fact that there is a forum here for pedophiles, offenders, etc. and it's appropriate for such people to post their victim issues there and get support and advice from other pedophiles, offenders, loved ones, etc. that have been through it or can help, as well as others who post appropriately.
I do not think that there is any need to have hurtfull responses from SO's posted in this forum. But, at the same time, I do not think that the fact that somebody is an SO should exclude them entirely.
There isn't going to be an outright across the board ban of a class of people, but if current and future controls aren't sufficient all options will be considered.
The guys that are truly trying to do something negative are just going to find a way to create an alternate profile. Some of them will get nasty.
True, some will try. It's happened in the past. In fact, the first major case of it, a pedophile who created supporters was caught by me rather quickly and was a major reason for implementing a user registration process in 2003. If someone creates a second persona and posts inappropriate posts in this forum, hopefully moderation will catch that most of the time and users will help out by contacting me when something is missed.
There's no magic solution and no way to make everyone happy. If I have to make a decision that benefits one group while having a negative impact on another, that's something I may have to do.
| See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult
the Glossary. |
Switch to Flat View
Message 165078 Dehumanizing the SO's
Posted by Ruined
on Oct 20, 2005 06:54 AM | Also by Ruined
| Gender: Male,
Age Bracket: 40 - 49,
State: Pennsylvania,
Country: United States |
Thread 165078, Ruined, Oct 20, 2005 06:54 AM [Dehumanizing the SO's] 165102, steve, Oct 20, 2005 02:39 PM 165116, Ruined, Oct 20, 2005 05:26 PM 165203, Hannahsmom, Oct 21, 2005 08:38 PM 165273, victorialondon, Oct 22, 2005 06:06 PM [You must get your story ito wder circul...] 165275, orolan, Oct 22, 2005 06:48 PM 165278, Ruined, Oct 22, 2005 07:36 PM 165279, Valerie, Oct 22, 2005 07:38 PM 165308, orolan, Oct 23, 2005 02:18 PM 165347, momhelpingbyherself, Oct 23, 2005 08:13 PM [orlon and valerie] 165325, Valerie, Oct 23, 2005 03:40 PM 165388, steve, Oct 24, 2005 04:30 PM [Thread now closed]
Forum Home
| Top of Thread
|
|