| Net Nanny 5 |
|---|
The world's leading parental control software, controls access to websites and other online content such as Internet-based games, blocks file sharing of music, images and videos, and monitors a user's Internet activity.
Know what your child is up to!
Click here for more information.
|
|
|
Forum: Victims and Survivors Corner
Thread (Discussion): New Rule - No replies from RSOs, Pedos, Vigilantis, POs, LEO, etc
Switch to Flat View
Message 164933 (In Reply to Message 164927)
Posted by steve
on Oct 18, 2005 05:09 PM | Also by steve
| Gender: Male,
Age Bracket: 30 - 39,
State: Virginia,
Country: United States |
I'm fine with that, though categories might be better. If a thread starter wants to name categories of people who he/she doesn't want to reply or only wants replies from that is fine. If someone doesn't want a specific list of people to reply, that might ruffle their feathers and it's doubtful the poster would be able to rattle of all current users (nevermind future users) who he/she might want to not reply. Same with restricting to specific users. I won't be able to review each thread starter's wishes and review each reply made so it'll have to be self-policing, with the honor system and users contacting me privately if there's a concern so I can take action if necessary.
| See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult
the Glossary. |
Switch to Flat View
Message 164927
How about?
Posted by dp1
on Oct 18, 2005 04:47 PM | Also by dp1
| Gender: Female,
Age Bracket: N/A,
State: Florida,
Country: United States |
Thread
164924, dp1, Oct 18, 2005 04:33 PM
164925, steve, Oct 18, 2005 04:39 PM
164927, dp1, Oct 18, 2005 04:47 PM [How about?]
164933, steve, Oct 18, 2005 05:09 PM
165004, Valerie, Oct 19, 2005 03:03 PM
165011, dp1, Oct 19, 2005 03:51 PM [Val]
Forum Home
| Top of Thread
|
|
