| Net Nanny 5 |
The world's leading parental control software, controls access to websites and other online content such as Internet-based games, blocks file sharing of music, images and videos, and monitors a user's Internet activity.
Know what your child is up to!
Click here for more information.
|
|
|
Forum: Victims and Survivors Corner
Thread (Discussion): Question about online registry Switch to Flat View
Message 164141 (In Reply to Message 164113) babs
Posted by dp1
on Oct 11, 2005 08:13 AM | Also by dp1
| Gender: Female,
Age Bracket: N/A,
State: Florida,
Country: United States |
Hello babs and welcome to this forum. I am so sorry New Jersey doesn't place level 2's on the internet. I agree with you that they should because they pose a risk.
The public may, without limitation, obtain access to the Internet registry to view an individual registration record, any part of, or the entire Internet registry concerning all offenders whose risk of reoffense is moderate; however, the individual registration record of an offender whose risk of reoffense has been determined to be moderate will not be made available to the public on the Internet registry if the sole sex offense committed by the offender which renders him or her subject to the registration requirements is one of the following:
(1) an adjudication of delinquency for any sex offense;
(2) a conviction or acquittal by reason of insanity for sexual assault, aggravated criminal contact, or criminal contact under circumstances in which the offender was related to the victim by blood or affinity to the third degree or was a foster parent, a guardian, or stood in loco parentis within the household; or
(3) a conviction or acquittal by reason of insanity for sexual assault, aggravated criminal contact, or criminal contact in any case in which the victim assented to the commission of the offense but by reason of age was not capable of giving lawful consent.
These exceptions will not apply, however, if the State establishes by clear and convincing evidence that, given the particular facts and circumstances of the offense and the characteristics and propensities of the
offender, the risk to the public posed by the offender is substantially similar to that posed by offenders whose risk of reoffense is moderate and who do not qualify under the exceptions.
It's amazing how the government gets to decide for you who is dangerous to someone and who isn't? I find this appalling.
We'll never understand why a women with kids gets messed up with a man who abused his own kids. It makes no sense does it? Maybe placing his photo on the internet will help and maybe it won't. Denial runs deep with incest offenders and the people around them that they lie to and deceive. Have you tried talking to the Mom?
| See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult
the Glossary. |
Switch to Flat View
Message 164113
Posted by babs
on Oct 11, 2005 01:00 AM | Also by babs
| Gender: Female,
Age Bracket: N/A,
State: New Jersey,
Country: United States |
Thread 163916, babs, Oct 08, 2005 07:41 PM 163918, steve, Oct 08, 2005 10:24 PM 163919, steve, Oct 08, 2005 10:39 PM 163920, babs, Oct 08, 2005 10:50 PM [answer to your question] 163966, dp1, Oct 09, 2005 04:32 PM 163943, oicu812, Oct 09, 2005 12:04 PM 164032, babs, Oct 10, 2005 05:02 AM 164133, oicu812, Oct 11, 2005 05:34 AM 164240, kids1st, Oct 12, 2005 06:29 AM 164073, steve, Oct 10, 2005 04:01 PM 164113, babs, Oct 11, 2005 01:00 AM 164121, steve, Oct 11, 2005 02:34 AM 164224, babs, Oct 12, 2005 03:31 AM [Sorry] 164291, oicu812, Oct 12, 2005 02:52 PM 164344, steve, Oct 12, 2005 09:58 PM 164353, oicu812, Oct 12, 2005 11:50 PM 164141, dp1, Oct 11, 2005 08:13 AM [babs] 164226, babs, Oct 12, 2005 03:48 AM 164281, dp1, Oct 12, 2005 02:10 PM 164407, momhelpingbyherself, Oct 13, 2005 02:00 PM [dp1] 164406, momhelpingbyherself, Oct 13, 2005 01:59 PM [babs] 164871, babs, Oct 18, 2005 02:30 AM
Forum Home
| Top of Thread
|
|