| Net Nanny 5 |
The world's leading parental control software, controls access to websites and other online content such as Internet-based games, blocks file sharing of music, images and videos, and monitors a user's Internet activity.
Know what your child is up to!
Click here for more information.
|
|
|
Forum: Victims and Survivors Corner
Thread (Discussion): Megan's Law California Switch to Flat View
Message 128506 (In Reply to Message 128503) 290.95
Posted by HerFriend
on Mar 11, 2004 02:38 AM | Also by HerFriend
| Gender: Male,
Age Bracket: 60 - 69,
State: New York,
Country: United States |
Thanks for the info and I will give you any information that will take the conversation further.
Its disappointing that the law was enacted in Sept 96 because that postdates the marriage by 3 months. I wonder if someone employed prior to Sept 96 had the obligation to inform their employer once the law was enacted.
Regarding 290.95 being limited to employment, I think the language reads:
“Every person required to register under Section 290, who applies or accepts a position as an employee or volunteer with any person, group, or organization where the registrant would be working directly and in an unaccompanied setting with minor children on more than an incidental and occasional basis or have supervision or disciplinary power over minor children, shall disclose his or her status as a registrant, upon application or acceptance of a position, to that person, group, or organization.”
My guess is that this is a little broader than employment. A spouse is clearly a person and a family might be considered a group so I would guess that a registered child molester has a responsibility to tell the neighbor or the wife if he’s going to baby sit the kids.
Regarding the probation, I believe it ended (one year) after the wedding but I’m not 100% clear on that. It clearly ended after she moved in with him which was a couple of years before the wedding.
I think the relevance is not if he can be held accountable to the State of California Probation Department but rather does it help in showing in a civil proceeding that he deceived the probation department and his future wife. Did he lie to his probation office when a woman with two children moved in with him?
I’m just trying to educate myself and maybe find someone that has knowledge of a similar situation.
| See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult
the Glossary. |
Switch to Flat View
Message 128503
Posted by orolan
on Mar 11, 2004 01:26 AM | Also by orolan
| Gender: Male,
Age Bracket: 40 - 49,
State: N/A,
Country: United States |
Thread 128482, HerFriend, Mar 10, 2004 10:27 PM [Looking for advice] 128483, steve, Mar 10, 2004 10:45 PM 128484, HerFriend, Mar 10, 2004 11:12 PM [Thanks and here is some more.] 128503, orolan, Mar 11, 2004 01:26 AM 128506, HerFriend, Mar 11, 2004 02:38 AM [290.95] 128538, orolan, Mar 11, 2004 08:31 PM 128567, Rejected 128550, dp1, Mar 12, 2004 01:52 AM [HerFriend] 128669, poetsdreamscape, Mar 14, 2004 10:52 PM [other motives?]
Forum Home
| Top of Thread
|
|