Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

 
Home | Sex Offender Registry | Megan's Law | Forums (Message Boards) | News Archive
AMBER Alert | Law Enforcement Agencies | Directory of Sites | Polls | Library | Glossary | More Resources                             Login | About Us
Net Nanny 5
The world's leading parental control software, controls access to websites and other online content such as Internet-based games, blocks file sharing of music, images and videos, and monitors a user's Internet activity.

Know what your child is up to!

Click here for more information.

Forum: Victims and Survivors Corner

Thread (Discussion): Megan's Law California


Switch to Flat View

In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 128484 (In Reply to Message 128483)
Thanks and here is some more.


Posted by
HerFriend on Mar 10, 2004 11:12 PM | Also by HerFriend
Gender: Male, Age Bracket: 60 - 69, State: New York, Country: United States

Thanks for this.

I am aware of the public disclosure parts of Megan’s law. My direct concern is the effect it might have on the responsibility of the preditor to disclose his conviction to a woman with children that he marries. (My understanding is that this is not uncommon.)

What I believe is:

Sec 290 (Magan’s Law) adds additional responsibility on any sex offender. According to Calsexoffenders.net (a website that gives advice to California Sex Offenders):

“DUTY OF DISCLOSURE

If you are going to apply for or accept a position as either an employee or volunteer with any Person, Group or Organization where you would be working directly and in an unaccompanied setting with minor children, or be supervising them or have disciplinary authority over them, the law requires that you TELL THE PERSON OR PEOPLE OFFERING YOU THIS POSITION THAT YOU ARE A REGISTERED SEX OFFENDER or it's a misdemeanor punishable by six months in the County Jail or a fine of $1,000. or both.”

I already know he was on probation – and that his probation specified that:

21a Not associate with minors, nor frequent places where minors congregate, unless in the company of a responsible adult who knows the defendant is on probation for 664/288(a.

I am also trying to find the date California's Megan's law was passed so that I can know if it even applied when they married.

See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult the Glossary.
Switch to Flat View


Message 128483


Posted by steve on Mar 10, 2004 10:45 PM | Also by steve
Gender: Male, Age Bracket: 30 - 39, State: Virginia, Country: United States


Thread


128482, HerFriend, Mar 10, 2004 10:27 PM [Looking for advice]
      128483, steve, Mar 10, 2004 10:45 PM
            128484, HerFriend, Mar 10, 2004 11:12 PM [Thanks and here is some more.]
                  128503, orolan, Mar 11, 2004 01:26 AM
                        128506, HerFriend, Mar 11, 2004 02:38 AM [290.95]
                              128538, orolan, Mar 11, 2004 08:31 PM
                                    128567, Rejected
      128550, dp1, Mar 12, 2004 01:52 AM [HerFriend]
      128669, poetsdreamscape, Mar 14, 2004 10:52 PM [other motives?]

Forum Home | Top of Thread
Tell a Friend about this page.
Copyright 1998-2007 SexCriminals.com and Befriend | About Site | Credits | Contact Us