| Top Posters Since October 2003 |
|---|
dp1 | 4000+ | orolan | 4000+ | Navigatr1 | 2500+ | Silvert... | 2500+ | 1dadof5 | 2500+ | Valerie | 2000+ | steve | 1500+ | victori... | 1000+ | myoung | 1000+ | rabbitr... | 750+ | HPierce | 750+ | poetsdr... | 750+ | Renunci... | 750+ | lj | 750+ | fallenone | 500+ | DoTheCr... | 500+ | marta | 500+ | momhelp... | 500+ | prozac | 500+ | rebel51 | 500+ | PVulcan | 250+ | anti | 250+ | rodsmith | 250+ | LockEmUp | 250+ | Quest | 250+ | artie | 250+ | KK | 250+ | LostTime | 250+ | TGoodman | 250+ | amberleaf | 250+ | deadmom... | 250+ | brennus | 100+ | scarlett | 100+ | mousein... | 100+ | thepar | 100+ | assumpt... | 100+ | lildrafire | 100+ | JakeLF | 100+ | MrTruth | 100+ | june5 | 100+ |
|
|
Forum: Old Message Board
Thread (Discussion): Kanin study a SHAM!
Switch to Flat View
Message 116093
Kanin study a SHAM!
Posted by x_marta
on Sep 15, 2003 11:43 PM | Also by x_marta
| Gender: ,
Age Bracket: ,
State: ,
Country: |
The study of the oft quoted Mr. Eugene Kanin, professor at Purdue University, can officially be discarded as evidence supporting a 41% false rape allegation frequency, not only because his sample size is miniscule, but because only half of the women in his study who fabricated a rape actually pointed the finger at a specific person (last sentence, 6th paragraph of the 'Findings' section in the study). Now last time I checked, there has to be a person at the end of the allegation finger for anyone to actually stand accused, much less suffer the horrible fate of men accused of rape. THAT'S RIGHT FOLKS, only 13.5 of the 45 women who made up rapes actually pointed a finger at someone. That drops Mr. Kanin's percentage down to 12.3%, still high, it's true, but no 41%. And given that Mr. Kanin willfully misused the word 'allegation,' to the detrimental effect of everyone interested in the topic, I'm not inclinded to believe that the rest of his methods are all that scrupulous.
And as for you, MR. H. PIERCE, I have now
1.) twice exposed that you don't even READ the "studies" you refer to, and
2.) thoroughly and convincingly demonstrated the need for good citations.
Had you offered a correct one in August of last year when you made the original post, I could have looked up the study and saved a lot of time. (Thanks for coming through, Orolan) Instead, because it is your belief that in addition to evaluating the study, I should have to shoulder the burden of making sure whatever crappy source you quote isn't equally negligent with their evaluation of studies, it took me 3-4 days to find it. And if Orolan hadn't given me a cite, it would have been even LONGER.
The house of cards that H. Pierce built is officially DOWN!
| See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult
the Glossary. |
Thread
116093, x_marta, Sep 15, 2003 11:43 PM [Kanin study a SHAM!]
116102, x_losttime, Sep 16, 2003 12:02 AM [Re: Kanin study a SHAM!]
116132, x_orolan, Sep 16, 2003 09:13 AM [Re: Kanin study a SHAM!]
116137, x_marta, Sep 16, 2003 10:46 AM [Re: Kanin study a SHAM!]
116138, x_orolan, Sep 16, 2003 11:30 AM [Re: Kanin study a SHAM!]
116187, x_marta, Sep 16, 2003 08:15 PM [Re: Kanin study a SHAM!]
116150, x_HPierce, Sep 16, 2003 12:57 PM [putting words in my mouth mara]
116168, x_marta, Sep 16, 2003 05:24 PM [Re: putting words in my mouth mara]
116175, x_HPierce, Sep 16, 2003 07:09 PM [pathetically grasping at str...]
116202, x_marta, Sep 17, 2003 01:47 AM [Lying]
116217, x_HPierce, Sep 17, 2003 09:40 AM [AND SO WAS YOURS!]
116270, x_marta, Sep 17, 2003 07:50 PM [Re: AND SO WAS YOURS!]
116286, Rejected
116342, x_HPierce, Sep 18, 2003 03:12 PM [Re: AND SO WAS Y...]
116345, x_Steve, Sep 18, 2003 03:47 PM [Re: AND SO WAS ...]
116354, x_marta, Sep 18, 2003 05:03 PM [Re: AND SO WAS ...]
116363, x_HPierce, Sep 18, 2003 06:46 PM [Actually ...]
116372, x_marta, Sep 18, 2003 07:35 PM [Re: AND SO WAS ...]
116376, x_Steve, Sep 18, 2003 08:34 PM [Re: AND SO ...]
117924, x_TryingtoSurviv, Oct 09, 2003 08:29 AM [Re: AND SO WAS YOURS!]
118023, x_marta, Oct 10, 2003 11:44 AM [Re: AND SO WAS YOURS!]
118149, x_TryingtoSurviv, Oct 13, 2003 11:06 AM [Re: AND SO W...]
118172, x_marta, Oct 13, 2003 07:12 PM [Re: AND SO WAS YOURS!]
116277, x_marta, Sep 17, 2003 09:03 PM [Question for Orolan]
116136, x_marta, Sep 16, 2003 10:39 AM [Re: Kanin study a SHAM!]
116156, x_HPierce, Sep 16, 2003 01:38 PM [marta 'down for the count']
116185, Rejected
116219, x_marta, Sep 17, 2003 10:06 AM [That says it ALL!]
116224, x_HPierce, Sep 17, 2003 11:05 AM [yeah sure.]
116271, x_marta, Sep 17, 2003 08:03 PM [Re: yeah sure.]
Forum Home
| Top of Thread
|
|
