| Top Posters Since October 2003 |
|---|
dp1 | 4000+ | orolan | 4000+ | Navigatr1 | 2500+ | Silvert... | 2500+ | 1dadof5 | 2500+ | Valerie | 2000+ | steve | 1500+ | victori... | 1000+ | myoung | 1000+ | rabbitr... | 750+ | HPierce | 750+ | poetsdr... | 750+ | Renunci... | 750+ | lj | 750+ | fallenone | 500+ | DoTheCr... | 500+ | marta | 500+ | momhelp... | 500+ | prozac | 500+ | rebel51 | 500+ | PVulcan | 250+ | anti | 250+ | rodsmith | 250+ | LockEmUp | 250+ | Quest | 250+ | artie | 250+ | KK | 250+ | LostTime | 250+ | TGoodman | 250+ | amberleaf | 250+ | deadmom... | 250+ | brennus | 100+ | scarlett | 100+ | mousein... | 100+ | thepar | 100+ | assumpt... | 100+ | lildrafire | 100+ | JakeLF | 100+ | MrTruth | 100+ | june5 | 100+ |
| Newest Users |
|---|
| Registered within the last 72 hours. | | glmoyao66 | | greatdane | | jpcustom | | l2lees | | mame4454 | | movado1 |
|
|
Forum: Old Message Board
Thread (Discussion): Pedophile can't be punished for thoughts
Switch to Flat View
Message 112165 (In Reply to Message 112152)
We already have laws
Posted by x_HPierce
on Jul 03, 2003 11:00 AM | Also by x_HPierce
| Gender: ,
Age Bracket: ,
State: ,
Country: |
katie asks:
>>>
My question is, don't you think that without the laws to seprerate child from adult that there would be more adults drawn to children? These adults may not have the careful, gentle, respectful thoughts and ways you do. I think more children would be hurt because there would not be any laws to keep the "bad" people away from them.
>>>
No I don't. If we removed the age of consent laws children would still be protected under adult laws such as RAPE, sexual assault, sexual harrassment just to name a few. People sometimes think the elimination of the AOC would create an open season on kids. That simply isn't the case. The outcome would be that healthy relationships would be allowed where both partners are happy, and freely consent. Those people who would force themselves on children would still be dealt with by laws that adequately protect adults today. No longer would you have people victimized by law simply because one partner was too young. These people aren't victims (except once LE and social service get through with them). It would take away the incentive of those who would falsely accuse others of touching them when they were 15 years old even though they had consented to it back then. Cases in court would be based on actual damage done to the individual not the wrongly perceived notion that any underage intamicy is wrong. Convict those that hurt, violate or coerce others... Don't victimize innocent people who are in relationships or freely consent.
It properly puts the burden of raising the child back on the parents where it belongs. It takes government out of raising the children by laws that don't protect a child anymore than the laws that protect adults.
If a sex offender wants to molest a child, they will do so no matter if the law they break is child molestation or rape. They will do it no matter what. It does make a difference to those in relationships where society and the law dictate morals in the form of laws.
H. Pierce (proud pedosexual)
| See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult
the Glossary. |
Switch to Flat View
Message 112152
?? adult/minor relationships
Posted by x_Katie
on Jul 03, 2003 02:02 AM | Also by x_Katie
| Gender: ,
Age Bracket: ,
State: ,
Country: |
Thread
111989, x_HPierce, Jun 28, 2003 07:41 PM [Pedophile can't be punished for thoughts]
111990, x_Silverthorne, Jun 28, 2003 08:14 PM [About Time]
111993, x_HPierce, Jun 28, 2003 11:16 PM [I agree]
111994, x_Casey, Jun 28, 2003 11:22 PM [Re: About Time]
112003, x_HPierce, Jun 29, 2003 10:29 AM [Good and bad]
112020, x_Casey, Jun 30, 2003 01:59 PM [Re: Good and bad]
112034, x_HPierce, Jun 30, 2003 11:18 PM [Not really, Casey]
112054, x_Casey, Jul 01, 2003 03:42 AM [Re: Not really, Casey]
112063, x_HPierce, Jul 01, 2003 11:22 AM [thanks Casey]
112066, x_Casey, Jul 01, 2003 12:37 PM [--_--]
112084, x_HPierce, Jul 01, 2003 03:19 PM [Have to see both sides]
112092, x_Casey, Jul 01, 2003 06:31 PM [Re: Have to see bo...]
112110, x_HPierce, Jul 01, 2003 11:56 PM [Thanks for th...]
112152, x_Katie, Jul 03, 2003 02:02 AM [?? adult/mi...]
112165, x_HPierce, Jul 03, 2003 11:00 AM [We alr...]
112178, x_Casey, Jul 03, 2003 04:21 PM [Re: ?? a...]
112185, x_anti, Jul 03, 2003 06:31 PM [Re: ??...]
139978, paulina831, Sep 23, 2004 08:17 AM
111991, x_simon, Jun 28, 2003 08:57 PM [Re: Pedophile can't be punished for thoughts]
112018, x_CJ, Jun 30, 2003 12:09 PM [Re: Pedophile can't be punished for thoughts]
112025, x_Sisco, Jun 30, 2003 03:41 PM [Re: Good and bad]
112035, x_HPierce, Jun 30, 2003 11:22 PM [I'm glad you support my postion.]
112030, x_HPierce, Jun 30, 2003 09:49 PM [Re: Pedophile can't be punished for thoughts]
112106, x_Silverthorne, Jul 01, 2003 09:46 PM [Not a danger?]
112111, x_HPierce, Jul 02, 2003 12:02 AM [I agree]
Forum Home
| Top of Thread
|
|
