Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

  
Home | Sex Offender Registry | Megan's Law | Forums (Message Boards) | News Archive
AMBER Alert | Law Enforcement Agencies | Directory of Sites | Polls | Library | Glossary | More Resources                             Login | About Us

Top Posters Since October 2003
dp14000+
orolan4000+
Navigatr12500+
Silvert...2500+
1dadof52500+
Valerie2000+
steve1500+
victori...1000+
myoung1000+
rabbitr...750+
HPierce750+
poetsdr...750+
Renunci...750+
lj750+
fallenone500+
DoTheCr...500+
marta500+
momhelp...500+
prozac500+
rebel51500+
PVulcan250+
anti250+
rodsmith250+
LockEmUp250+
Quest250+
artie250+
KK250+
LostTime250+
TGoodman250+
amberleaf250+
deadmom...250+
brennus100+
scarlett100+
mousein...100+
thepar100+
assumpt...100+
lildrafire100+
JakeLF100+
MrTruth100+
june5100+

Newest Users
Registered within the last 72 hours.
devlin077
gtallon
lauraleee
mommy123
rukbat14

Forum: Polls

Thread (Discussion): Poll 1041 - Should employers be required to conduct criminal background checks before hiring new emp

Switch to Flat View

In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 158546 (In Reply to Message 136048)


Posted by rwjourneyman on Aug 13, 2005 01:37 AM | Also by rwjourneyman
Gender: Male, Age Bracket: 40 - 49, State: Florida, Country: United States
Sure, let's make it even harder for these folks to conform to societies demands for acceptible behavior.

First, we are going to make every sexual offender since 1960, no matter the actual charge, paint their face onto the world-wide web for anyone (including employers, local survivors just looking to cause someone ELSE some grief for a change, or a busy-body naighbor that just loves to spead gossip) to look up, allowing any one of these people to target the offender for any number of 'legal' hate crimes (posting pictures, taking out radio ads, picketting their homes, petitioning the city to have them forcibly removed...). THAT'S all legal, so who the heck CARES about causing the offender any grief?

It is my personal opinion that at least 90 percent of first time sexual offenders will never commit another sexual offense. I believe the govenor of Iowa said the same thing a few days back (it was in an article in the local paper because a town in Volusia County is refusing to enact the more insane SO laws and either Des Moines or Iowa as a whole was mentioned as reference).

What truely needs to be done is to psychologically evaluate each case AS IT LEAVES THE PRISON SYSTEM to determine if the 'first offense' was a fluke (accidents DO happen, mistakes ARE made). Now, I'm not talking about a simple session or two with a fly-by-night shrink here. I'm talking about a minimum of 6 months in a psych ward with daily sessions with a (perhaps) federally certified sexual psychologist.

Should that psych return a good result, then the offender can be released without further consequence. A bad result would mean that the offender would be monitored, either by web listings or the new GPS tracking several states have been proposing. A second offense (of any kind) would then result in LIFE IN PRISON.

Should the released offender, the one with a good psych result, stay clean for a number of years (let'ds say 10, just for this post) then he or she can petition for their civil rights (voting, wepons laws, etc) to be reinstated.

I do not think that ANYTHING that does not require a psych workup will be effective in combating the ever-growing (or should that be ever-mediatized) trend toward sexual offenses. Placing people on websites, forcing them to wear a GPS device (similar to a house arrest anklet), or forcing them to be the subject of mandatory criminal background checks will only make things worse (see a related thread, started by me - should be viewable in a couple of days).

See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult the Glossary.
Switch to Flat View

Message 136048
Introduction


Posted by admin on Jun 14, 2004 11:25 PM | Also by admin

Thread


136048, admin, Jun 14, 2004 11:25 PM [Introduction]
      136093, orolan, Jun 15, 2004 10:40 PM [No way]
            136096, steve, Jun 15, 2004 11:53 PM
                  136099, orolan, Jun 16, 2004 01:07 AM
                        136100, brennus, Jun 16, 2004 02:18 AM
                              136102, steve, Jun 16, 2004 02:29 AM
                                    136711, myoung, Jun 29, 2004 05:50 AM [BGC]
      136104, dp1, Jun 16, 2004 03:45 AM
            136182, fallenone, Jun 17, 2004 07:23 PM
                  136712, myoung, Jun 29, 2004 05:58 AM [I think there is more to it]
                        136718, LostTime, Jun 29, 2004 01:02 PM [EEOC]
                              136748, myoung, Jun 30, 2004 04:09 AM [I was just gonna say....]
                                    136763, momto2girls, Jun 30, 2004 07:58 PM
                                          136777, myoung, Jul 01, 2004 01:17 PM [very true]
                                                136982, FrustratedMi, Jul 06, 2004 08:38 AM [What do you do]
                                                      168008, Valerie, Nov 25, 2005 10:56 AM
                                          137061, orolan, Jul 08, 2004 01:48 AM [momto2girls]
                                                137332, momto2girls, Jul 13, 2004 12:25 PM [Orolan]
                                                      151229, 684867, May 06, 2005 03:43 AM [rebuttal]
            168033, rodsmith, Nov 25, 2005 04:41 PM
      158546, rwjourneyman, Aug 13, 2005 01:37 AM
      162831, Scaye, Sep 27, 2005 04:50 PM
      165812, anti, Oct 30, 2005 03:10 AM [yes]
            166968, june5, Nov 09, 2005 02:05 AM [NO]
                  168009, Valerie, Nov 25, 2005 11:33 AM
                        168036, orolan, Nov 25, 2005 04:56 PM
                              168108, Valerie, Nov 27, 2005 03:04 PM
                                    168208, orolan, Nov 29, 2005 04:01 PM
                                          168751, Valerie, Dec 07, 2005 03:32 PM
                                                168797, Renunciation, Dec 07, 2005 07:38 PM [Val]
                                                      168924, Valerie, Dec 08, 2005 03:46 PM
                                                            169061, Renunciation, Dec 09, 2005 06:48 PM
                                                169025, orolan, Dec 09, 2005 03:16 PM
                                                      171862, indisaray, Jan 22, 2006 06:30 PM
                                                            171997, Valerie, Jan 24, 2006 05:15 AM
                                                                  172179, indisaray, Jan 26, 2006 04:31 AM
                        171979, june5, Jan 24, 2006 03:58 AM [Val]
      167231, momhelpingbyherself, Nov 12, 2005 09:12 PM
      172127, justsayno, Jan 25, 2006 05:50 PM [This must be made LAW in all states]
            172152, orolan, Jan 25, 2006 09:06 PM
                  172180, june5, Jan 26, 2006 04:35 AM
                        172247, orolan, Jan 27, 2006 03:16 PM
Forum Home | Top of Thread
Tell a Friend about this page.
Copyright 1998-2007 SexCriminals.com and Befriend | About Site | Credits | Contact Us