Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

 
Home | Sex Offender Registry | Megan's Law | Forums (Message Boards) | News Archive
AMBER Alert | Law Enforcement Agencies | Directory of Sites | Polls | Library | Glossary | More Resources                             Login | About Us

Top Posters Since October 2003
dp14000+
orolan4000+
Navigatr12500+
Silvert...2500+
1dadof52500+
Valerie2000+
steve1500+
victori...1000+
myoung1000+
rabbitr...750+
HPierce750+
poetsdr...750+
Renunci...750+
lj750+
fallenone500+
DoTheCr...500+
marta500+
momhelp...500+
prozac500+
rebel51500+
PVulcan250+
anti250+
rodsmith250+
LockEmUp250+
Quest250+
artie250+
KK250+
LostTime250+
TGoodman250+
amberleaf250+
deadmom...250+
brennus100+
scarlett100+
mousein...100+
thepar100+
assumpt...100+
lildrafire100+
JakeLF100+
MrTruth100+
june5100+

Newest Users
Registered within the last 72 hours.
dholla1031
Pooter
tlgrjlfromsc
tsand

Forum: Polls

Thread (Discussion): Poll 1032 - Should people convicted of making a false sex crime claim appear on a public registry?


Switch to Flat View

In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 122708 (In Reply to Message 122695)
Hmmm


Posted by
marta on Dec 05, 2003 05:02 AM | Also by marta
Gender: Female, Age Bracket: 30 - 39, State: N/A, Country: United States

>>>
I think the problem here has to do with "crime". The poll question asks simply if false accusers should be on some form of public registry. It doesn't ask if they should be charged with a felony criminal offense. So why the necessity for a trial and due process protections?
>>>
In my first post I wrote that such measures should be reserved for those who had been tried and convicted. This remains my belief even if the person in question is accused of child abuse, rape, or falsely accusing someone of rape. The state should not be able to compile lists of people and associate their names with crimes if the people have not, in fact, been convicted of a crime. Period.

If it happens with other crimes, it isn't an argument to do the same with those who have allegedly falsely accused someone of rape, but rather something OBVIOUSLY unjust that I'm surprised I haven't heard about it until now, given the community of posters here at sexcriminals.com. I'd like to hear more about these CPS abuse registries. In what way are they the same as the sex offender registries that most people seem to be refering to when they use the term? Are they in any way available to the public? Obviously this will vary from state to state, but just give me what you know first-hand so I can investigate further.


>>>
"One can not be forced to serve as both witness and defendant in a trial for one's life or liberty"
True. But we aren't talking about taking away anybody's life or liberty, are we?
>>>

Um. I sort of assumed that, were falsely accusing someone of rape to become a crime, there'd be an actual sentence for it, not just the registry. The registry is to warn off all the poor suckers the person runs into after they get out of jail and/ pay a huge fine (and let's not start that argument again - thanks).

See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult the Glossary.
Switch to Flat View


Message 122695


Posted by orolan on Dec 04, 2003 07:22 PM | Also by orolan
Gender: Male, Age Bracket: 40 - 49, State: N/A, Country: United States


Thread


121965, admin, Nov 19, 2003 08:36 PM [Introduction]
      122001, Navigatr1, Nov 20, 2003 06:35 AM [False Accusations Need To Be Taken Seriously...]
            122007, TGoodman, Nov 20, 2003 10:01 AM
                  156449, mawmaw, Jul 17, 2005 07:44 AM
            122031, orolan, Nov 20, 2003 06:58 PM
                  122183, marta, Nov 23, 2003 12:04 AM [Trial v. Hearing]
                        122653, orolan, Dec 03, 2003 11:22 PM
                              122694, marta, Dec 04, 2003 04:09 PM [Oh no, no. Can't have that.]
                                    122695, orolan, Dec 04, 2003 07:22 PM
                                          122708, marta, Dec 05, 2003 05:02 AM [Hmmm]
            122325, marta, Nov 25, 2003 05:06 PM [Vindictiveness has nothing to do with it]
            151936, mysticfyre, May 18, 2005 05:48 PM [Absolutely]
      122608, alambert, Dec 02, 2003 06:24 PM [yes they should]
            142515, rebel51, Dec 18, 2004 12:38 PM
                  142539, orolan, Dec 19, 2004 02:49 AM
                        143488, oioi, Jan 08, 2005 05:23 PM [1032]
      147933, monkey4u, Mar 24, 2005 04:31 AM

Forum Home | Top of Thread
Tell a Friend about this page.
Copyright 1998-2007 SexCriminals.com and Befriend | About Site | Credits | Contact Us