Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

 
Home | Sex Offender Registry | Megan's Law | Forums (Message Boards) | News Archive
AMBER Alert | Law Enforcement Agencies | Directory of Sites | Polls | Library | Glossary | More Resources                             Login | About Us

Forum: In the News

Thread (Discussion): [Colorado Springs Independent] Springs police reviewing sex offender site following Indy inquiry


In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 169154
Introduction


Posted by
admin on Dec 10, 2005 03:32 PM | Also by admin
Gender: N/A, Age Bracket: N/A, State: N/A, Country: N/A

Discuss the article Springs police reviewing sex offender site following Indy inquiry, by Michael de Yoanna, which appeared on Colorado Springs Independent on December 08, 2005.

Forum Home | Top of Thread
In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 169162 (In Reply to Message 169154)


Posted by
Renunciation on Dec 10, 2005 08:57 PM | Also by Renunciation
Gender: N/A, Age Bracket: N/A, State: N/A, Country: Bahrain

"Society has decided that some of these individuals might be scarier than even a murderer," Chief Luis Velez told the Independent two weeks ago, when the site was created.


Sad, but true.

A person who had extramarital sex and did not disclose the marriage also could be on the list.


Oh come on, if this is true, then we have a BIG problem and these lists are going to have more politicians than dangerous offenders... oh, wait... politicians ARE dangerous offenders.

R

Forum Home | Top of Thread | Jump To Parent (169154)
In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 169218 (In Reply to Message 169154)


Posted by
orolan on Dec 11, 2005 04:28 PM | Also by orolan
Gender: Male, Age Bracket: N/A, State: N/A, Country: United States

(4) Information released pursuant to this section, at a minimum,
shall include the name, address or addresses, and aliases of the registrant;
the registrant's date of birth; a photograph of the registrant, if requested and
readily available; and a history of the convictions of unlawful sexual
behavior resulting in the registrant being required to register pursuant to this
article. Information concerning victims shall not be released pursuant to
this section.

That's some pretty clear language to me. Straight from the enacted bill. The LEA is definitely REQUIRED to provide the criminal history.
So why this?
Attorneys for the police department now are taking a closer look at whether the site complies with the law

What's to look at? Either the history is there per the law, or it isn't. What's with all the posturing? The site violates state law, and should be shut down until such time that it is in compliance. And somebody put the Chief in his own jail for breaking the law.

Forum Home | Top of Thread | Jump To Parent (169154)

Thread


169154, admin, Dec 10, 2005 03:32 PM [Introduction]
      169162, Renunciation, Dec 10, 2005 08:57 PM
      169218, orolan, Dec 11, 2005 04:28 PM

Forum Home | Top of Thread
Tell a Friend about this page.
Copyright 1998-2007 SexCriminals.com and Befriend | About Site | Credits | Contact Us