| Top Posters Since October 2003 |
|---|
dp1 | 4000+ | orolan | 4000+ | Navigatr1 | 2500+ | Silvert... | 2500+ | 1dadof5 | 2500+ | Valerie | 2000+ | steve | 1500+ | victori... | 1000+ | myoung | 1000+ | rabbitr... | 750+ | HPierce | 750+ | poetsdr... | 750+ | Renunci... | 750+ | lj | 750+ | fallenone | 500+ | DoTheCr... | 500+ | marta | 500+ | momhelp... | 500+ | prozac | 500+ | rebel51 | 500+ | PVulcan | 250+ | anti | 250+ | rodsmith | 250+ | LockEmUp | 250+ | Quest | 250+ | artie | 250+ | KK | 250+ | LostTime | 250+ | TGoodman | 250+ | amberleaf | 250+ | deadmom... | 250+ | brennus | 100+ | scarlett | 100+ | mousein... | 100+ | thepar | 100+ | assumpt... | 100+ | lildrafire | 100+ | JakeLF | 100+ | MrTruth | 100+ | june5 | 100+ |
| Newest Users |
|---|
| Registered within the last 72 hours. | | anitatcandia | | glassmarble | | khf333 | | lisala33 | | marcorl | | rdehne | | vanessa | | zxcvbnm |
|
|
Forum: In the News
Thread (Discussion): [Wired News] Sexual predators lose an outlet
Switch to Flat View
Message 164942 (In Reply to Message 164340)
I'm Amazed this was allowed in the first place......
Posted by victorialondon
on Oct 18, 2005 05:53 PM | Also by victorialondon
| Gender: Female,
Age Bracket: 60 - 69,
State: N/A,
Country: United Kingdom |
I'm amazed this was ever allowed in the first place.
As for the web being a psreader of Child porn.
I don't appove of this filth in any way.
But it's strange,in the case of digital images(a growing number of actors in films of all sorts from now on will be non existent people ,as in Toy story,star trek,Harry Potter and many others)that paediatricans (in this country a paediatricain and his family were attacked by a mob,confusing the term with padophile,lynch mobs aren't the best experts at interpreting the clasiical Greek roots of words) are called in to assess the ages of people who have never existed.
Similarily it's odd that the verdict of a court or appeal court,as to what is/is not Child pornography will put thousands who have downloaded in or out of the category of "PAEDOPHILE!!!!"(different state by state,due to differing consent laws,and legal Child "marriage"what someone is posted for,the address where they live with their Children for in one state,is legal across the road in another state).
Tragically strange is the way the web was used to spread Child pornography in the following instance.(see thread)
Two poor 16 year old girls,in Latrobe,with common juvenile exhibitionism,posted nude pictures of themselves on their website.They were then charged with "MAKING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY/ABUSING A CHILD!!!!",the Child they abused themselves.Their boyfriends who recieved the pictures were charged with "POSSESSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY!!!!".
They all now stand to be posted and pilloried for this.
What if this were your daughter? your son?.
| See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult
the Glossary. |
Switch to Flat View
Message 164340
Introduction
Posted by admin
on Oct 12, 2005 05:22 PM | Also by admin
Thread
164340, admin, Oct 12, 2005 05:22 PM [Introduction]
164343, Renunciation, Oct 12, 2005 09:56 PM
164345, steve, Oct 12, 2005 10:09 PM
164381, artie, Oct 13, 2005 02:32 AM
164461, saintjimmy, Oct 13, 2005 07:15 PM
164465, Renunciation, Oct 13, 2005 08:16 PM [Challenge to Non-Sex Offenders!!!]
164557, mawmaw, Oct 14, 2005 10:33 PM
164652, Renunciation, Oct 15, 2005 08:35 PM
164462, artie, Oct 13, 2005 07:25 PM
164942, victorialondon, Oct 18, 2005 05:53 PM [I'm Amazed this was allowed in the firs...]
165556, MrTruth, Oct 27, 2005 01:52 AM
Forum Home
| Top of Thread
|
|
