Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

Top Posters Since October 2003
dp1	4000+
orolan	4000+
Navigatr1	2500+
Silvert...	2500+
1dadof5	2500+
Valerie	2000+
steve	1500+
victori...	1000+
myoung	1000+
rabbitr...	750+
HPierce	750+
poetsdr...	750+
Renunci...	750+
lj	750+
fallenone	500+
DoTheCr...	500+
marta	500+
momhelp...	500+
prozac	500+
rebel51	500+
PVulcan	250+
anti	250+
rodsmith	250+
LockEmUp	250+
Quest	250+
artie	250+
KK	250+
LostTime	250+
TGoodman	250+
amberleaf	250+
deadmom...	250+
brennus	100+
scarlett	100+
mousein...	100+
thepar	100+
assumpt...	100+
lildrafire	100+
JakeLF	100+
MrTruth	100+
june5	100+

Newest Users
Registered within the last 72 hours.
anitatcandia
glassmarble
khf333
lisala33
marcorl
rdehne
vanessa
zxcvbnm

Forum: In the News

Thread (Discussion): [10News.com] Police officer ordered to register as sex offender

Switch to Flat View

In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 164189 (In Reply to Message 164122)

Posted by orolan on Oct 11, 2005 07:31 PM | Also by orolan

Gender: Male, Age Bracket: 40 - 49, State: N/A, Country: United States

Curious Ren. Do you have a kid living in the home? If you do, don't you suppose you have the same right to access the registry as anybody else to protect the child from sex offenders? Sure you have a wife. What if she leaves you and its just you and the child?
I'm still wondering why no sex offender with a family has contested this aspect of the law. Especially since every person has the right to know what information the government has on them and assure its accuracy.

BTW I access the California registry all the time, SO status aside. They can find me and bust me if they want. I'll welcome the lawsuit and the millions it will get me.

See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult the Glossary.

Switch to Flat View

Message 164122

Posted by Renunciation on Oct 11, 2005 03:21 AM | Also by Renunciation

Gender: N/A, Age Bracket: 40 - 49, State: N/A, Country: Bahrain

It is not that obvious to me.

Registries are public to allow the free lfow of information so the public "can protect itself" They are not meant to be punishment or a means for harassing the offender. Keeping their addresses confidential places the public, particularly children, at risk.

In many states it is against the law to use the public lists for harassing the offender or his/her family.

Former employment is moot, a new set of rules shall apply and former LEOs are protected because the public lists are not to be used to harm or harass the offenders. If they do use the lists to harass them, they can be charged with a crime.

A San Diego Cnty deputy was recently convicted of a sex offense. He was boinking a few teenie cop groupies in Riverside County. He took a plea, but he must register. However, I am not sure if he will make the state site or not. I am not allowed to view the CA website because I am an offender, but my wife told me that I am not listed, but those that are do not have their previous employment(er) listed.

Would this exclusion apply to federal intelligence agents NSA/CIA/DIA and FBI agents as well? If so, then people who worked in a military capacity in support of NSA and DIA missions might also be considered or automatically flagged for exclusion? I find it odd that those agencies would be communicating that well. I find even more surprising that ANY exclusion to being listed would exist in today's culture and 'tudes about sex crimes.

I wonder..... because I do not appear on my convicting state, nor my resident state and I came up clean on a background check when I was working for a PI doing Workmans Comp Fraud surveillence. I disclosed per my T&Cs and just to be honest. He ran a background and came back with zilch, nada, nothing...  I said are you sure?????? He verified my SSN and full name, etc... all that came up was a bankruptcy and something else unrelated to sex crime.

Thread

163995, admin, Oct 09, 2005 05:49 PM [Introduction]
      164076, steve, Oct 10, 2005 04:08 PM
            164126, Navigatr1, Oct 11, 2005 04:26 AM
      164112, dp1, Oct 11, 2005 12:55 AM
            164120, artie, Oct 11, 2005 02:12 AM
                  164146, dp1, Oct 11, 2005 08:32 AM
                        164147, dp1, Oct 11, 2005 08:36 AM
                              164165, artie, Oct 11, 2005 04:24 PM
                              164232, oicu812, Oct 12, 2005 05:37 AM
                        164164, artie, Oct 11, 2005 04:23 PM
                        164216, artie, Oct 12, 2005 03:01 AM
            164122, Renunciation, Oct 11, 2005 03:21 AM
                  164189, orolan, Oct 11, 2005 07:31 PM
                        164193, Renunciation, Oct 11, 2005 08:29 PM
                              164234, oicu812, Oct 12, 2005 05:48 AM
                                    164322, Renunciation, Oct 12, 2005 05:23 PM
            164230, oicu812, Oct 12, 2005 05:32 AM
      164190, orolan, Oct 11, 2005 07:34 PM
            164235, oicu812, Oct 12, 2005 05:49 AM
      164198, mawmaw, Oct 11, 2005 10:15 PM

Forum Home | Top of Thread

Tell a Friend about this page.

Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

Forum: In the NewsThread (Discussion): [10News.com] Police officer ordered to register as sex offender

Message 164189 (In Reply to Message 164122)

Message 164122

Thread

Forum: In the News

Thread (Discussion): [10News.com] Police officer ordered to register as sex offender