Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

 
Home | Sex Offender Registry | Megan's Law | Forums (Message Boards) | News Archive
AMBER Alert | Law Enforcement Agencies | Directory of Sites | Polls | Library | Glossary | More Resources                             Login | About Us

Forum: In the News

Thread (Discussion): [King County Journal] Sex-offender law gets court win: Judge rules against ACLU; Issaquah violato...


In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 161203
Introduction


Posted by
admin on Sep 11, 2005 01:17 PM | Also by admin
Gender: N/A, Age Bracket: N/A, State: N/A, Country: N/A

Discuss the article Sex-offender law gets court win: Judge rules against ACLU; Issaquah violators facing fines of up to $250 a day, by Noel S. Brady, which appeared on King County Journal on September 09, 2005.

Forum Home | Top of Thread
In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 161320 (In Reply to Message 161203)


Posted by
artie on Sep 12, 2005 03:33 PM | Also by artie
Gender: Male, Age Bracket: N/A, State: Florida, Country: United States

It's really not a win. The restraining order was requested to prohibit the city from enforcing a law. The city has every right to enforce a law. Whether or not the law is legal will begin scrutiny on 9/23.

A question to be asked to the complaining residents:

If the RSO's have been released into the community staying with a family member is not good enough for you, where would you suggest he go? Is it your intent to push him into my neighborhood wher he has no supervision whatsoever?
do you think he is less dangerous to the community even more bitter and alone?
The law is stupid and very dangerous. these laws are going to create more offenses.

But hey, it's popular.

Forum Home | Top of Thread | Jump To Parent (161203)
In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 161350 (In Reply to Message 161203)


Posted by
orolan on Sep 12, 2005 08:25 PM | Also by orolan
Gender: Male, Age Bracket: N/A, State: N/A, Country: United States

Unfortunately the King County Journal website works about as well as a sex offender proximity law. In other words, not at all (at least right now). So I can't read the article. The Seattle Times tells a somewhat different story.
It says a "court commissioner" denied the temporary restraining order. That's not the same as a "Judge". It's purely an admin function.
The city can't forcibly remove the sex offenders without a court order, Tanaka said, but it can fine them.

That's right. And the city can't lock them up for not paying the fines. All it can do is sue them in civil court.
As Artie pointed out, the ACLU lawsuit hasn't even been heard yet, let alone ruled against. Somebody at the King County Journal is taking their court-affirmed privilege of lying their butt off seriously:-))

Forum Home | Top of Thread | Jump To Parent (161203)

Thread


161203, admin, Sep 11, 2005 01:17 PM [Introduction]
      161320, artie, Sep 12, 2005 03:33 PM
      161350, orolan, Sep 12, 2005 08:25 PM

Forum Home | Top of Thread
Tell a Friend about this page.
Copyright 1998-2007 SexCriminals.com and Befriend | About Site | Credits | Contact Us