|
|
Forum: In the News
Thread (Discussion): [DesMoinesRegister.com] Offenders marry to avoid charges
Message 160898
Introduction
Posted by admin
on Sep 07, 2005 10:34 PM | Also by admin
| Gender: N/A,
Age Bracket: N/A,
State: N/A,
Country: N/A |
Discuss the article Offenders marry to avoid charges, by Frank Santiago, which appeared on DesMoinesRegister.com on September 07, 2005.
Forum Home
| Top of Thread
Message 160900 (In Reply to Message 160898)
Posted by steve
on Sep 08, 2005 02:37 AM | Also by steve
| Gender: Male,
Age Bracket: N/A,
State: Virginia,
Country: United States |
Pretty ironic - now women are marrying the sex offenders - not what lawmakers had in mind. I haven't read the actual statute, but I hope it doesn't read "male sex offender", "woman", etc. - comes across as pretty gender-biased in the article. How do you think the state's politicians will address what's happening?
Forum Home
| Top of Thread | Jump To Parent (160898)
Message 160958 (In Reply to Message 160900)
Posted by Renunciation
on Sep 08, 2005 04:48 PM | Also by Renunciation
| Gender: N/A,
Age Bracket: N/A,
State: N/A,
Country: Bahrain |
I think they will create legislation that prevents sex offenders from entering relationships with people who have custody or overnight visitation with minor children or grandchildren, or any minors for that matter. Entering relationship will include marriage, engagement, dating, internet or telephone conversations and oral communication not required by either party to fulfull their job function.
One state will try to make it effective in violation of ex post facto, ruling hundreds of marriages void. This in turn will turn the IRS upside down, but offenders will then be in violation of their probation for filing false tax returns stating they were married, but the marriage was illegal.
That will get challenged, and being based on sex offenders, the judges will either agree with the state or "they are not protecting our children."
Offenders, men and women alike will then be forced from their homes and families and their marriages ruled void. They will have to re-file their tax returns. Names will have to be changed back to the original names. The Family Courts will be full of cases of deadbeat dads and moms trying to get relief from support and custody due to the parent illegally marrying a sex offender. The offenders however, if the primary bread winners in the previously legal, now void marriage, will still be financially responsible for support of children they could not have conceived because the marriage was illegal.
Then offenders will be contacted by terror groups, since their names, faces, addresses, employers and other info is available to everyone and be offered $100,000 cash and 6 months to spend it in exchange for strapping a bomb to their chest and detonating it at their next annual registration.
The nation will cascade into a Katrina-like fear and China will come in through the West and Russia through the East, Mexico and Venezuela and South America in General will cover the southern flank and Canada will still be like deer in the headlights like they were when hockey was cancelled.
Everyone will get a clean slate, terror will stop or nearly stop, the world will be much safer for all and in another 150 years the cycle will repeat itself.
How about another pot of coffee? LOL.
Forum Home
| Top of Thread | Jump To Parent (160900)
Message 160978 (In Reply to Message 160900)
Posted by orolan
on Sep 08, 2005 06:06 PM | Also by orolan
| Gender: Male,
Age Bracket: N/A,
State: N/A,
Country: United States |
They'll follow Tennessee's lead and change the law so it reads that sex offenders can't reside in homes with children that are not their biological offspring. Makes no difference if he's married to the mother or not.
Forum Home
| Top of Thread | Jump To Parent (160900)
Thread
160898, admin, Sep 07, 2005 10:34 PM [Introduction]
160900, steve, Sep 08, 2005 02:37 AM
160958, Renunciation, Sep 08, 2005 04:48 PM
160978, orolan, Sep 08, 2005 06:06 PM
Forum Home
| Top of Thread
|
|
|
