Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

Top Posters Since October 2003
dp1	4000+
orolan	4000+
Navigatr1	2500+
Silvert...	2500+
1dadof5	2500+
Valerie	2000+
steve	1500+
victori...	1000+
myoung	1000+
rabbitr...	750+
HPierce	750+
poetsdr...	750+
Renunci...	750+
lj	750+
fallenone	500+
DoTheCr...	500+
marta	500+
momhelp...	500+
prozac	500+
rebel51	500+
PVulcan	250+
anti	250+
rodsmith	250+
LockEmUp	250+
Quest	250+
artie	250+
KK	250+
LostTime	250+
TGoodman	250+
amberleaf	250+
deadmom...	250+
brennus	100+
scarlett	100+
mousein...	100+
thepar	100+
assumpt...	100+
lildrafire	100+
JakeLF	100+
MrTruth	100+
june5	100+

Newest Users
Registered within the last 72 hours.
boobookitty
lauraleee
mommy123
rukbat14

Forum: In the News

Thread (Discussion): [Palm Beach Post] Post sex offender data online to clarify individual risk

Switch to Flat View

In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 158986 (In Reply to Message 158953)
Ann

Posted by dp1 on Aug 17, 2005 02:16 PM | Also by dp1

Gender: Female, Age Bracket: N/A, State: Florida, Country: United States

Do you have the specific statutes he was convicted of? I'll need to check the database to make sure the exact statute is available. Sometimes if the exact statute isn't on the database the PO has to find one close to what he was charged with. So this is the first thing I need to check.

Secondly, when offenders have a sentence that includes 2 types of supervision the DOC website doubles everything. For example, lets say you were found guilty of 1)grand theft 2) Poss of cocaine and 3) Poss of porn and was sentenced to 2 years house arrest followed by 10 years probation. The PO has to enter the house arrest sentence in their computer with a start and stop date then they have to enter the probation sentence with the start and stop date. So when that information flows over to the website it looks like this:
grand theft - 2 years
poss of cocaine - 2 years
poss of porn - 2 years
grand theft - 10 years
poss of cocaine - 10 years
poss of porn - 10 years

So instead of 3 charges and a 12 year sentence it looks like 6 charges. But wait, it gets better. If he violates his house arrest, gets revoked and gets placed back on again with the same sentence it'll look like this:

grand theft - 2 years
poss of cocaine - 2 years
poss of porn - 2 years
grand theft - 10 years
poss of cocaine - 10 years
poss of porn - 10 years
grand theft - 2 years
poss of cocaine - 2 years
poss of porn - 2 years
grand theft - 10 years
poss of cocaine - 10 years
poss of porn - 10 years

So now he has 12 charges. Unbelievable!

Last problem. Ok, all this DOC stuff has nothing to do with the FDLE flyer having the wrong qualifying offense. It seems to me that FDLE would not be willing to change that until DOC gets on the ball. So, let's first find out the exact statute he was sentenced on and whether the DOC database can actually be fixed. Then we'll move on the FDLE corrections.

I will be back.

See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult the Glossary.

Switch to Flat View

Message 158953

Posted by ann018 on Aug 17, 2005 02:08 AM | Also by ann018

Gender: Female, Age Bracket: N/A, State: Florida, Country: United States

Hi Orolan,

His amended order reads as follows for community control and probation:

Charge 1 –	Internet electronic solicitation to commit lewd & lacivious battery

Charge 2 – Transmission child porn by electronic device or equipment

I believe part of the problem is that the arresting document only stated L&L Battery.

As I stated in my earlier post there was only a conversation with another adult (detective) about a 14-year old and one email sent with 2 pictures. It was somewhat complicated by the fact there were also 2 counties in FL involved - the one where the detective was and the one where my son lives.

I have sent dp1 a private message with the same information and his doc number. His information (second transmission charge has not been removed from their site either) and it still states "L/L BATTERY V 12-15 YO".

He has shown his PO the amended documents (signed 4/25/05 by the judge; his final sentencing hearing was 1/26/05). However, to my son's knowledge his PO did not complete or submit any new paperwork  to the FDLE.

I have often wondered how many other SO's information may be incorrect and they are not aware. Especially if they can no longer have access to a computer or have someone that can run an "employer" background check. I have been in HR for many years and know the processes and have told my son from day one he will always have to be up front and honest when interviewing, which he has. However, if he tells them up front and then they run a background check that states fondling, etc. he doesn't have a rats chance in he--.

I'm hopeful that dp1 will be able to help.

Thread

158598, admin, Aug 13, 2005 02:54 PM [Introduction]
      158762, dp1, Aug 15, 2005 05:12 AM
      158786, Navigatr1, Aug 15, 2005 03:02 PM
            158815, orolan, Aug 15, 2005 04:58 PM
                  158865, ann018, Aug 16, 2005 05:37 AM [Information needs to be correct!]
                        158914, orolan, Aug 16, 2005 04:12 PM
                              158953, ann018, Aug 17, 2005 02:08 AM
                                    158986, dp1, Aug 17, 2005 02:16 PM [Ann]
                                    159073, dp1, Aug 18, 2005 05:32 AM [Ann]
                                          159998, dp1, Aug 28, 2005 11:19 PM [Great News]
                        158925, dp1, Aug 16, 2005 04:25 PM

Forum Home | Top of Thread

Tell a Friend about this page.

Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

Forum: In the NewsThread (Discussion): [Palm Beach Post] Post sex offender data online to clarify individual risk

Message 158986 (In Reply to Message 158953)Ann

Message 158953

Thread

Forum: In the News

Thread (Discussion): [Palm Beach Post] Post sex offender data online to clarify individual risk

Message 158986 (In Reply to Message 158953)
Ann