| Top Posters Since October 2003 |
|---|
dp1 | 4000+ | orolan | 4000+ | Navigatr1 | 2500+ | Silvert... | 2500+ | 1dadof5 | 2500+ | Valerie | 2000+ | steve | 1500+ | victori... | 1000+ | myoung | 1000+ | rabbitr... | 750+ | HPierce | 750+ | poetsdr... | 750+ | Renunci... | 750+ | lj | 750+ | fallenone | 500+ | DoTheCr... | 500+ | marta | 500+ | momhelp... | 500+ | prozac | 500+ | rebel51 | 500+ | PVulcan | 250+ | anti | 250+ | rodsmith | 250+ | LockEmUp | 250+ | Quest | 250+ | artie | 250+ | KK | 250+ | LostTime | 250+ | TGoodman | 250+ | amberleaf | 250+ | deadmom... | 250+ | brennus | 100+ | scarlett | 100+ | mousein... | 100+ | thepar | 100+ | assumpt... | 100+ | lildrafire | 100+ | JakeLF | 100+ | MrTruth | 100+ | june5 | 100+ |
| Newest Users |
|---|
| Registered within the last 72 hours. | | dholla1031 | | Pooter | | tlgrjlfromsc | | tsand |
|
|
Forum: In the News
Thread (Discussion): [North County Times] Supreme Court: 'Forgetting' to register unacceptable for sex offenders
Switch to Flat View
Message 154705 (In Reply to Message 154678)
Posted by 1dadof5
on Jun 28, 2005 03:41 PM | Also by 1dadof5
| Gender: Male,
Age Bracket: 40 - 49,
State: Indiana,
Country: United States |
that is really unjustified to further bring this guy down at the lowest point in his life for a regulatory statute that he had faithfully complied with, save this situation. His conviction was 22 years ago! he has always met all requirements, and has not re-offended in all this time. The key phrase that the USSC will need to consider if it goes that far is the element of the act "willfully failing to update his registration" there is no way in hell that the prosecution can prove that he willfully failed to update his registration. Plain and simple, he forgot. He had complied for 18 years before and has complied in the 3 years since(SO have been required to register long before megans law in CA)
On a side note, The Bush lapdog neo-con judge recently appointed to a federal judicial post by Bush, Justice Janice Brown was the one who read the decision. So much for claims of compassionate conservatism. One can see why the democrats fought so hard to keep this woman from being appointed. She is the posterwoman for right wing radical religious fundamentalists and has shown she cant be objective or fair.
Lets face it, given the struggles he was enduring, he simply forgot, plain and simple. If I were going through all he had to contend with during that time, I wouldnt give a rat's behind about some BS registry either
| See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult
the Glossary. |
Switch to Flat View
Message 154678
Posted by dp1
on Jun 27, 2005 11:50 PM | Also by dp1
| Gender: Female,
Age Bracket: N/A,
State: Florida,
Country: United States |
Thread
154599, admin, Jun 26, 2005 08:16 PM [Introduction]
154678, dp1, Jun 27, 2005 11:50 PM
154696, rabbitreborn, Jun 28, 2005 01:45 PM
154705, 1dadof5, Jun 28, 2005 03:41 PM
154721, newmind6, Jun 28, 2005 11:56 PM [Keep on truckin']
154728, 1dadof5, Jun 29, 2005 03:29 AM [newmind]
154748, dp1, Jun 29, 2005 01:57 PM
154796, orolan, Jun 29, 2005 05:19 PM
154814, 1dadof5, Jun 29, 2005 10:50 PM
155051, orolan, Jul 03, 2005 03:15 PM
Forum Home
| Top of Thread
|
|
