|
Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion |
are they now for or against the registry since they now know what its like being associated with an rso? Why do they have fears of being harmed?Id also like to know if they supported the registry before. Forum Home | Top of Thread | Jump To Parent (143585) In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user. Message 143617 (In Reply to Message 143572)Posted by orolan on Jan 11, 2005 01:41 AM | Also by orolan
I don't know if it's a huge flaw Looks like a pretty gaping "flaw" to me. 11 years ago, and nobody knows how to fix it. Forum Home | Top of Thread | Jump To Parent (143572) In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user. Message 143637 (In Reply to Message 143572)Posted by Silverthorne on Jan 11, 2005 05:38 AM | Also by Silverthorne
" He lived there before the Browns bought the place 11 years ago. " Boy this sounds like Florida...... 11 years to update? Silverthorne Forum Home | Top of Thread | Jump To Parent (143572) In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user. Message 143668 (In Reply to Message 143637)Posted by orolan on Jan 11, 2005 02:34 PM | Also by orolan
11 years to update? Worse than that. 11 years and they claim they can't do anything about it because they don't have a new address. Talk about showing their ignorance. How about substituting two simple words for an address: ABSCONDED REGISTRATION Forum Home | Top of Thread | Jump To Parent (143637) In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user. Message 143708 (In Reply to Message 143637)Posted by Silverthorne on Jan 12, 2005 03:45 AM | Also by Silverthorne
I think its funny they're worried they might be vandalized. I thought stuff like that didn't happen. As for this family I'd suggest they sue the state for emotional distress. Ask for $50m and work your way down from that. Seems these states only decide to do the right thing when they get either bad publicity or sued. Silverthorne Forum Home | Top of Thread | Jump To Parent (143637) In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user. Message 143758 (In Reply to Message 143708)Posted by orolan on Jan 12, 2005 10:56 PM | Also by orolan
It is comical that they suddenly fear for their safety. Like you said, this sort of thing doesn't happen;-)) Forum Home | Top of Thread | Jump To Parent (143708) In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user. Message 143760 (In Reply to Message 143708)Posted by steve on Jan 12, 2005 11:52 PM | Also by steve
I think its funny they're worried they might be vandalized. I thought stuff like that didn't happen. It's not a question of whether it happens; it's a question of whether it's prevelant. There will always be people out there that harrass and attack those who they don't like, including those who've committed sex crimes. Even before there were public registries, there were people who found out about sex offenders and harrassed and attacked them. Have a higher percentage of them faced this since the public registries became accessible? I don't know. And if the prevelance has increased, how much of it is due to the public registries and how much is due to increased media focus on sex crimes and sex offenders? And how much can be simply attributed to the increased ease of distributing information in the Internet age? As for this family I'd suggest they sue the state for emotional distress. Would that work? If I were them, I'd go to the media (seems they did that), get a lawyer to file some sort of injunction to remove my address and print up a huge sign on a tall stake in my yard that said no sex offender lives here, the government has the old address for an offender posted and won't fix it and include contact information so others can make themselves heard. Forum Home | Top of Thread | Jump To Parent (143708) In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user. Message 144297 (In Reply to Message 143572)
|
||||||||||||||||
| Gender: Female, Age Bracket: N/A, State: N/A, Country: United Kingdom |
| Tell a Friend about this page. |
| Copyright 1998-2007 SexCriminals.com and Befriend | About Site | Credits | Contact Us |