Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

  
Home | Sex Offender Registry | Megan's Law | Forums (Message Boards) | News Archive
AMBER Alert | Law Enforcement Agencies | Directory of Sites | Polls | Library | Glossary | More Resources                             Login | About Us

Top Posters Since October 2003
dp14000+
orolan4000+
Navigatr12500+
Silvert...2500+
1dadof52500+
Valerie2000+
steve1500+
victori...1000+
myoung1000+
rabbitr...750+
HPierce750+
poetsdr...750+
Renunci...750+
lj750+
fallenone500+
DoTheCr...500+
marta500+
momhelp...500+
prozac500+
rebel51500+
PVulcan250+
anti250+
rodsmith250+
LockEmUp250+
Quest250+
artie250+
KK250+
LostTime250+
TGoodman250+
amberleaf250+
deadmom...250+
brennus100+
scarlett100+
mousein...100+
thepar100+
assumpt...100+
lildrafire100+
JakeLF100+
MrTruth100+
june5100+

Newest Users
Registered within the last 72 hours.
1curious
cbg0708
CHEERIOSKEEPER
concernednewparent
dboy
Debby
HDDG
love032588
matavin
rexchinnappa

Forum: In the News

Thread (Discussion): [KELOLAND.COM] New law would create national sex offender database

Switch to Flat View

In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 141594 (In Reply to Message 141591)


Posted by orolan on Nov 28, 2004 02:22 PM | Also by orolan
Gender: Male, Age Bracket: 40 - 49, State: N/A, Country: United States
If he registered in another state he'd be on the national registry.

Irrelevant. If the offender is not in the state he's registered in, the fact that he is also on a national registry does no good. Unless you know his name and where he is "supposed" to be. Back to the WiFi laptop and looking at 500,000 photos:-)

When you run someone's NCIC now

Again, this requires knowing the person's name. People doing abductions from mall parking lots are not in the habit of allowing their prospective abductees to run background checks on them prior to going on with the abduction;-)

I think Dru's law is trying to prevent people from not having access to information on sex offenders just because a state line is in the way.

Since when was access to state registries restricted? Out of all the registries, I know of only two that have some semblance of restriction to insure that "community notification" stays in the "community". The rest of the states leave it out there for the whole world to see.

My interpretation of Dru's law was more forcused on the intense supervision after release

A portion of the bill:
(1) IN GENERAL- Each State shall intensively monitor, for not less than 1 year, any person described under paragraph (2) who--
(A) has been unconditionally released from incarceration by the State; and
(B) has not been civilly committed pursuant to a civil commitment proceeding, or any equivalent proceeding under State law.

Note that is not "1 year", but an indefinite time period that is AT LEAST 1 year. Note also Part A, where it says "unconditionally released". In other words, game over. Time's up. Sentence complete. No court in the land will rule that long-term GPS monitoring is not further punishment under such conditions. This is one of the main stumbling blocks in the House, and the House won't pass this bill until it is either stricken or re-worded to define "monitoring". The few Representatives I've spoken to about the issue see "monitoring" as routine address verification.

GPS monitoring for a year after release that wouldn't be a bad idea.

What good will that do? Aren't you one of those who claims recidivism numbers are worhless because they only cover the first 3-5 years and of course we all know SOs will wait 10-15 years before they reoffend;-)

See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult the Glossary.
Switch to Flat View

Message 141591


Posted by dp1 on Nov 28, 2004 12:07 PM | Also by dp1
Gender: Female, Age Bracket: N/A, State: Florida, Country: United States

Thread


141534, admin, Nov 24, 2004 06:55 PM [Introduction]
      141544, Navigatr1, Nov 25, 2004 04:19 AM [Should Take It Further]
            141558, 1dadof5, Nov 26, 2004 08:10 AM
      141568, orolan, Nov 26, 2004 07:05 PM
            141587, 1dadof5, Nov 28, 2004 08:21 AM
            141591, dp1, Nov 28, 2004 12:07 PM
                  141594, orolan, Nov 28, 2004 02:22 PM
                        141608, dp1, Nov 28, 2004 05:34 PM
                              141648, poetsdreamscape, Nov 30, 2004 02:21 AM [national registry?]
                                    141725, orolan, Dec 02, 2004 06:19 PM [Poet]
                              141689, orolan, Dec 02, 2004 02:32 AM
                                    141807, Navigatr1, Dec 04, 2004 04:04 PM [Make Them Public]
                                          142256, gfndresident, Dec 11, 2004 07:45 PM [IT wouldn't Have Helpe...]
                                                142319, orolan, Dec 13, 2004 01:54 AM
                              143448, roccy, Jan 08, 2005 06:25 AM [ummmm]
                                    143521, orolan, Jan 09, 2005 03:11 PM [roccy]
                                          143555, dp1, Jan 09, 2005 08:01 PM
                                                143567, orolan, Jan 10, 2005 02:28 AM
                                                      143573, dp1, Jan 10, 2005 04:08 AM
                                                            143688, orolan, Jan 12, 2005 12:53 AM
Forum Home | Top of Thread
Tell a Friend about this page.
Copyright 1998-2007 SexCriminals.com and Befriend | About Site | Credits | Contact Us