Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

Top Posters Since October 2003
dp1	4000+
orolan	4000+
Navigatr1	2500+
Silvert...	2500+
1dadof5	2500+
Valerie	2000+
steve	1500+
victori...	1000+
myoung	1000+
rabbitr...	750+
HPierce	750+
poetsdr...	750+
Renunci...	750+
lj	750+
fallenone	500+
DoTheCr...	500+
marta	500+
momhelp...	500+
prozac	500+
rebel51	500+
PVulcan	250+
anti	250+
rodsmith	250+
LockEmUp	250+
Quest	250+
artie	250+
KK	250+
LostTime	250+
TGoodman	250+
amberleaf	250+
deadmom...	250+
brennus	100+
scarlett	100+
mousein...	100+
thepar	100+
assumpt...	100+
lildrafire	100+
JakeLF	100+
MrTruth	100+
june5	100+

Newest Users
Registered within the last 72 hours.
asmyers
burgerking
grace4u2

Forum: In the News

Thread (Discussion): [Finger Lakes Times] Sex offender loophole angers many in Lyon

Switch to Flat View

In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 132500 (In Reply to Message 132462)

Posted by lj on May 03, 2004 10:49 AM | Also by lj

Gender: Male, Age Bracket: 50 - 59, State: California, Country: United States

Maybe some therapy would help the DOC to be able to own up to their behavior in this matter. It works pretty good on many of those prisoners they have authority over.

You know, lead by example!

See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult the Glossary.

Switch to Flat View

Message 132462

Posted by orolan on May 03, 2004 12:15 AM | Also by orolan

Gender: Male, Age Bracket: 40 - 49, State: N/A, Country: United States

Looks like these people are blaming the wrong folks. The court said <blockquote>unless they are reclassified under the requirements of the court’s ruling.</blockquote>

<blockquote>“It’s my understanding that he has to be reclassified, and until then, law enforcement officials are prohibited from making public disclosure,”</blockquote>
So why didn't anybody reclassify him?

<blockquote>“This injunction defeats the purpose of Megan’s Law,”</blockquote>
No it doesn't. It merely requires that SO's classified pre-Megan's Law be reclassified post-Megan's Law.

This isn't rocket science. The Court issues an injunction in 1998, the guy gets out on parole in 1999 and released from parole 2 years later in 2001. The injunction was clear that if DOC wanted him classified at something higher than Level 1 they would have to re-classify him. And DOC did what during the time this man was on parole? Nothing.

And now DOC says it's the Court's fault? Get real. DOC dropped the ball and is looking for a scapegoat.

Thread

132222, admin, Apr 30, 2004 08:05 PM [Introduction]
      132462, orolan, May 03, 2004 12:15 AM
            132500, lj, May 03, 2004 10:49 AM
      132469, Silverthorne, May 03, 2004 01:20 AM [Whats sad]
            132550, orolan, May 03, 2004 09:19 PM
      136815, 2busy4me, Jul 02, 2004 02:34 AM [One of "many angered".]
            136818, steve, Jul 02, 2004 05:10 AM

Forum Home | Top of Thread

Tell a Friend about this page.

Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

Forum: In the NewsThread (Discussion): [Finger Lakes Times] Sex offender loophole angers many in Lyon

Message 132500 (In Reply to Message 132462)

Message 132462

Thread

Forum: In the News

Thread (Discussion): [Finger Lakes Times] Sex offender loophole angers many in Lyon