Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

 
Home | Sex Offender Registry | Megan's Law | Forums (Message Boards) | News Archive
AMBER Alert | Law Enforcement Agencies | Directory of Sites | Polls | Library | Glossary | More Resources                             Login | About Us

Top Posters Since October 2003
dp14000+
orolan4000+
Navigatr12500+
Silvert...2500+
1dadof52500+
Valerie2000+
steve1500+
victori...1000+
myoung1000+
rabbitr...750+
HPierce750+
poetsdr...750+
Renunci...750+
lj750+
fallenone500+
DoTheCr...500+
marta500+
momhelp...500+
prozac500+
rebel51500+
PVulcan250+
anti250+
rodsmith250+
LockEmUp250+
Quest250+
artie250+
KK250+
LostTime250+
TGoodman250+
amberleaf250+
deadmom...250+
brennus100+
scarlett100+
mousein...100+
thepar100+
assumpt...100+
lildrafire100+
JakeLF100+
MrTruth100+
june5100+

Newest Users
Registered within the last 72 hours.
CharlesLiar
coliva
jackiemar
nathalie
tweetynena34

Forum: In the News

Thread (Discussion): [New York Times] Questions rise over imprisoning sex offenders past their terms


Switch to Flat View

In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 122144 (In Reply to Message 121845)
Catch-22


Posted by
lj on Nov 22, 2003 05:48 AM | Also by lj
Gender: Male, Age Bracket: 50 - 59, State: California, Country: United States

Very provocative article, indeed! Talk about power and authority gone bananas, this article shows the arrogance (and ignorance) of some who we deem "experts" to handle with any sort of common logic the issues they are supposed to address in a responsible manner.

It's as if this civil commitment program is really just a gulag rather than a center for treatment and rehabilitation measures. A really sad note to this entire fiasco is that many people don't care about what goes on in there because of the type of criminal this happens to.

This sort of thing justifies those who call going after sex offenders so harshly as "witch-hunting." The obvious argument against that sentence is that these guys shouldn't have committed the crime in the first place, but that literally does not excuse the repercussions they're going through as a result of this program's inexcusable "lies and manipulations" of facts through faulty logic and analysis.

It's also in the same vein as the prosecutors who win cases merely for their own track record of accomplishments rather than the justice to be served.

And it's said that sex offenders are the most manipulative, deceiving, and controlling of all the types of criminals there are. These so-called experts are "straining at gnats" to support their unbalanced conclusions, while the general public "swallows the whole camel." I guess the definition of "criminal" needs to expanded out some more to cover a few of the "legal" hoodlums.

That's probably a pipedream, though. Power corrupts, but absolute power corrupts absolutely!

See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult the Glossary.
Switch to Flat View


Message 121845
Introduction


Posted by admin on Nov 18, 2003 06:57 PM | Also by admin

Thread


121845, admin, Nov 18, 2003 06:57 PM [Introduction]
      121846, steve, Nov 19, 2003 12:18 AM [Very detailed article]
            121915, Silverthorne, Nov 19, 2003 05:38 PM
      122144, lj, Nov 22, 2003 05:48 AM [Catch-22]

Forum Home | Top of Thread
Tell a Friend about this page.
Copyright 1998-2007 SexCriminals.com and Befriend | About Site | Credits | Contact Us