Sex Offender Registries, Sex Offenders Search, News, Info and Discussion

 
Home | Sex Offender Registry | Megan's Law | Forums (Message Boards) | News Archive
AMBER Alert | Law Enforcement Agencies | Directory of Sites | Polls | Library | Glossary | More Resources                             Login | About Us

Top Posters Since October 2003
dp14000+
orolan4000+
Navigatr12500+
Silvert...2500+
1dadof52500+
Valerie2000+
steve1500+
victori...1000+
myoung1000+
rabbitr...750+
HPierce750+
poetsdr...750+
Renunci...750+
lj750+
fallenone500+
DoTheCr...500+
marta500+
momhelp...500+
prozac500+
rebel51500+
PVulcan250+
anti250+
rodsmith250+
LockEmUp250+
Quest250+
artie250+
KK250+
LostTime250+
TGoodman250+
amberleaf250+
deadmom...250+
brennus100+
scarlett100+
mousein...100+
thepar100+
assumpt...100+
lildrafire100+
JakeLF100+
MrTruth100+
june5100+

Newest Users
Registered within the last 72 hours.
asmyers
burgerking
grace4u2

Forum: General

Thread (Discussion): Police step up efforts to keep tabs on sex offenders


Switch to Flat View

In order to post a message to a new thread or reply to existing messages you must be logged in. If you'd like to post messages please login or register as a new user.

Message 173584 (In Reply to Message 173371)
Good ol' hindsight


Posted by
june5 on Feb 21, 2006 07:31 PM | Also by june5
Gender: Female, Age Bracket: N/A, State: N/A, Country: United States

This could be a stab in the dark, but is it possible that SO's didn't "think of this" before they committed their crimes because this was not the law before they committed their crime?! I don't think any SO's who offended before this goes into effect could have taken into consideration that they might be checked on once a month before deciding to offend when this program (or is it "pogrom", lol) didn't exist at the time! I guess the same could be said for those who are complaining about being on the registry who committed their crimes before the registry was in existence.

As far as anybody "crying" on this thread, somehow I don't picture RodSmith or Orolan dripping tears onto their keyboards as they post here. I know I'm not! I know I have been through too much in my life to be crying over something like this.

Val, you are entitled to your opinion about SO's being checked on. Why are SO wives lumped in? I didn't marry an SO, but I did find myself married to one several years later. Is it because I didn't get a divorce? That means I have it coming to me? Maybe they should come lock me up for FTD. They could make that a felony along with FTR.

See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult the Glossary.
Switch to Flat View


Message 173371


Posted by Navigatr1 on Feb 18, 2006 09:28 PM | Also by Navigatr1
Gender: N/A, Age Bracket: N/A, State: N/A, Country: United States


Thread


173371, Navigatr1, Feb 18, 2006 09:28 PM
      173393, june5, Feb 19, 2006 02:47 AM
            173451, poetsdreamscape, Feb 19, 2006 10:37 PM [no]
                  173480, rodsmith, Feb 20, 2006 05:19 AM [poetsdreamscape]
                        174790, Pending Further Review
            173548, dp1, Feb 21, 2006 05:01 AM
                  173550, rodsmith, Feb 21, 2006 06:59 AM [dp1]
                        174793, Pending Further Review
                  173558, Navigatr1, Feb 21, 2006 01:29 PM
                  173564, Valerie, Feb 21, 2006 02:37 PM
                        173569, dp1, Feb 21, 2006 04:00 PM [Val]
                        173570, rodsmith, Feb 21, 2006 04:52 PM [valerie]
                        173574, orolan, Feb 21, 2006 05:12 PM
                  173602, poetsdreamscape, Feb 22, 2006 03:20 AM [dp1]
                        174794, Pending Further Review
                  174560, Rejected
      173502, momof5, Feb 20, 2006 06:17 PM
            173524, june5, Feb 21, 2006 12:14 AM
            173529, poetsdreamscape, Feb 21, 2006 01:49 AM [mom]
                  173589, Rejected
      173584, june5, Feb 21, 2006 07:31 PM [Good ol' hindsight]
            174561, 1dadof5, Mar 24, 2006 05:16 AM
                  174691, Pending Further Review
      173591, Rejected

Forum Home | Top of Thread
Tell a Friend about this page.
Copyright 1998-2007 SexCriminals.com and Befriend | About Site | Credits | Contact Us