| Top Posters Since October 2003 |
|---|
dp1 | 4000+ | orolan | 4000+ | Navigatr1 | 2500+ | Silvert... | 2500+ | 1dadof5 | 2500+ | Valerie | 2000+ | steve | 1500+ | victori... | 1000+ | myoung | 1000+ | rabbitr... | 750+ | HPierce | 750+ | poetsdr... | 750+ | Renunci... | 750+ | lj | 750+ | fallenone | 500+ | DoTheCr... | 500+ | marta | 500+ | momhelp... | 500+ | prozac | 500+ | rebel51 | 500+ | PVulcan | 250+ | anti | 250+ | rodsmith | 250+ | LockEmUp | 250+ | Quest | 250+ | artie | 250+ | KK | 250+ | LostTime | 250+ | TGoodman | 250+ | amberleaf | 250+ | deadmom... | 250+ | brennus | 100+ | scarlett | 100+ | mousein... | 100+ | thepar | 100+ | assumpt... | 100+ | lildrafire | 100+ | JakeLF | 100+ | MrTruth | 100+ | june5 | 100+ |
| Newest Users |
|---|
| Registered within the last 72 hours. | | asmyers | | burgerking | | grace4u2 |
|
|
Forum: General
Thread (Discussion): Police step up efforts to keep tabs on sex offenders Switch to Flat View
Message 173584 (In Reply to Message 173371) Good ol' hindsight
Posted by june5
on Feb 21, 2006 07:31 PM | Also by june5
| Gender: Female,
Age Bracket: N/A,
State: N/A,
Country: United States |
This could be a stab in the dark, but is it possible that SO's didn't "think of this" before they committed their crimes because this was not the law before they committed their crime?! I don't think any SO's who offended before this goes into effect could have taken into consideration that they might be checked on once a month before deciding to offend when this program (or is it "pogrom", lol) didn't exist at the time! I guess the same could be said for those who are complaining about being on the registry who committed their crimes before the registry was in existence.
As far as anybody "crying" on this thread, somehow I don't picture RodSmith or Orolan dripping tears onto their keyboards as they post here. I know I'm not! I know I have been through too much in my life to be crying over something like this.
Val, you are entitled to your opinion about SO's being checked on. Why are SO wives lumped in? I didn't marry an SO, but I did find myself married to one several years later. Is it because I didn't get a divorce? That means I have it coming to me? Maybe they should come lock me up for FTD. They could make that a felony along with FTR.
| See an abbreviation or acronym, but don't know what it stands for? Consult
the Glossary. |
Switch to Flat View
Message 173371
Posted by Navigatr1
on Feb 18, 2006 09:28 PM | Also by Navigatr1
| Gender: N/A,
Age Bracket: N/A,
State: N/A,
Country: United States |
Thread 173371, Navigatr1, Feb 18, 2006 09:28 PM 173393, june5, Feb 19, 2006 02:47 AM 173451, poetsdreamscape, Feb 19, 2006 10:37 PM [no] 173480, rodsmith, Feb 20, 2006 05:19 AM [poetsdreamscape] 174790, Pending Further Review 173548, dp1, Feb 21, 2006 05:01 AM 173550, rodsmith, Feb 21, 2006 06:59 AM [dp1] 174793, Pending Further Review 173558, Navigatr1, Feb 21, 2006 01:29 PM 173564, Valerie, Feb 21, 2006 02:37 PM 173569, dp1, Feb 21, 2006 04:00 PM [Val] 173570, rodsmith, Feb 21, 2006 04:52 PM [valerie] 173574, orolan, Feb 21, 2006 05:12 PM 173602, poetsdreamscape, Feb 22, 2006 03:20 AM [dp1] 174794, Pending Further Review 174560, Rejected 173502, momof5, Feb 20, 2006 06:17 PM 173524, june5, Feb 21, 2006 12:14 AM 173529, poetsdreamscape, Feb 21, 2006 01:49 AM [mom] 173589, Rejected 173584, june5, Feb 21, 2006 07:31 PM [Good ol' hindsight] 174561, 1dadof5, Mar 24, 2006 05:16 AM 174691, Pending Further Review 173591, Rejected
Forum Home
| Top of Thread
|
|